Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Business
  4. Mobile
  5. News

Third-party scheme that inflated phone bills results in $7.75M fine for AT&T

Add as a preferred source on Google

AT&T is facing some pretty hefty fines once again. It looks like some AT&T customers recently paid some money that they shouldn’t have been asked to pay thanks to a scam set up by a third party. As a result, AT&T now has to pay $7.75 million.

As part of the scam, AT&T accidentally allowed the scammers to charge $9 per month to customers for a fake directory assistance service, which was set up by suspected drug traffickers and used to launder money. It was first uncovered by the Drug Enforcement Agency.

Recommended Videos

“Two companies that engaged in a sophisticated fraud scheme were apparently able to circumvent those protections and submit unauthorized third-party charges that were billed by AT&T,” said AT&T in a statement. While the company was not aware of the scam, it still has to pay up.

A report from the FCC highlights exactly why — AT&T received a fee each time the fraudulent service showed up on a bill, so the company was making money, knowingly or unknowingly, off the scam. Of the total fine, $6.8 million is being paid to customers in refunds, and the other $950,000 is going to the U.S. Treasury as a fine.

As part of the investigation, the DEA seized $3.4 million worth of drugs, cars, gold, and computers — all in investigating the so-called Discount Directories and Enhanced Telecommunications Services.

“Affected former and current AT&T wireline telephone customers will receive these refunds via check within 90 days,” continued the company in its statement. “We stopped billing for these entities as of June 2015 and will also cease wireline third-party billing for other third parties, with limited exceptions.”

Of course, this isn’t the first time AT&T has had to pay up to the FCC. In 2014, the company was accused of falsely charging customers for services and had to pay a much larger $105 million fine.

Christian de Looper
Christian de Looper is a long-time freelance writer who has covered every facet of the consumer tech and electric vehicle…
I won’t buy the Galaxy A37 at $450, but I strongly recommend these 4 terrific options
The Galaxy A37 5G isn't a bad phone, it's just surrounded by better ones that cost less and refuse to let you overpay for a mediocre smartphone.
Galaxy A37 5G camera module.

Samsung launched the Galaxy A37 5G at $449.99 for the baseline variant with 6GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. The smartphone is $50 more expensive than its predecessor, and to me, it looks like the premium is going straight into tackling the rise in component cost due to the ongoing memory crisis rather than providing meaningful upgrades. 

There are plenty of things that could justify the price hike on paper. For instance, the chipset upgrade, Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 to Exynos 1480, provides a low double-digit improvement in performance, which is barely noticeable for regular users. The phone sports a slightly higher HDR brightness (1900 nits vs. 1700 nits) and a better IP rating (IP68 vs. IP67).

Read more
Apple says Lockdown Mode thwarted spyware attacks with a clean slate
Apple’s strongest defense is actually holding up
Lockdown Mode information page on an iPhone 14 Pro.

Apple says it has not seen a successful spyware attack on any iPhone with Lockdown Mode enabled, a claim it shared with TechCrunch.

Lockdown Mode arrived in 2022 as an opt-in feature for iPhone, iPad, and Mac. It was introduced as a stricter security mode for people at high risk of targeted attacks, such as journalists, activists, and government officials.

Read more
The Dynamic Island could shrink on the iPhone 18 series, and not just on the Pro models
One leaker, one claim, and a big question: is Apple genuinely ready to give every iPhone buyer the same design treatment as Pro owners this cycle?
Apple iPhone 17 Pro in Cosmic Orange leaning on a gray wall.

Apple’s Dynamic Island has been around long enough that most people have made their peace with it or forgotten it’s there. In fact, I’ve seen people associating the pill-shaped notch with newer iPhone models (released in the last 3 years). Now, a fresh leak suggests that the notch replacement is about to shrink, not just on the expensive models. 

What did the leaker actually say?

Read more