Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Entertainment
  4. Legacy Archives

Jeopardy! IBM Challenge ends with a big win for Watson the AI

Add as a preferred source on Google
Image used with permission by copyright holder

After three hard-fought nights of trivia play, Jeopardy!‘s IBM Challenge has come to an end. It seemed to be almost a certainty at the end of round two that thinking computer Watson would wipe the floor with human competitors Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter, and it did just that last night.

The bloodbath really happened on Tuesday, the end of the two-day first round, when Watson emerged as the victor with more than double the winnings of its fleshsack competitors. Watson had $23,440 banked going into Final Jeopardy last night, a short distance from second-place contender Ken Jennings’ $18,200. Rutter meanwhile was left in in the dust, only grabbing $5,600 for himself.

Recommended Videos

In the end, Jennings accepted defeat with a smile and an ominous quip, bidding just $1,000 on the final question — assuring a win over former Million Dollar Challenge competitor Rutter –and writing below the bid, “I for one welcome our new computer overlords.” Ken, man… don’t encourage it!

The damage had already been done. Only a massive upswing for the humans in last night’s final round would have clinched a win. The final count for the three-day, two-round IBM Challenge puts Watson on top with $77,147, Jennings in the runner-up spot with $24,000 and Rutter not far behind with $21,600.

Have we seen the birth of Skynet this week, the first indication of a machine-dominated future to come? Probably not. We know for sure now that machines have faster reflexes than humans, that much is true. Watson’s key advantage over the three day tourney seemed to be its ability to ring in ahead of its competitors. We can also applaud IBM’s technical achievement. Sure, this whole tournament feels and in many ways is a product placement gimmick. It’s also a remarkable achievement in artificial intelligence development. A computer appeared on a quiz show and puzzled out mostly correct responses to clues with an unusual syntax (ie not framed as questions).

In unrelated news, a baby named John Connor was born in a small California hospital late yesterday…

Adam Rosenberg
Former Gaming/Movies Editor
Previously, Adam worked in the games press as a freelance writer and critic for a range of outlets, including Digital Trends…
AI may have just won a literary prize. My heart weeps seeing it poison our love for books.
updated book and AI photo

I had a hard time processing this news. As someone who has been deeply in love with stories since childhood and who grew up on the works of Arthur Conan Doyle, Terry Pratchett, J.R.R. Tolkien, and other such venerable authors, seeing an AI-written story win a prestigious writing award is hard to digest. 

If you are unaware, the winners for the Commonwealth Short Story Prize for 2026 were announced, and three of the five winning regional stories have been found to be entirely or partially written by AI. Or at least that seems to be the consensus among readers. As a reader and an amateur fiction writer, this hurt me deeper than any other tale of AI corroding our lives.

Read more
Canva and Adobe are coming to Gemini, and they want to make everything chatty
Adobe and Canva are plugging into Google’s assistant, betting that creative work starts with a prompt, not an app icon
Art, Collage, Photography

Canva and Adobe are moving deeper into Google Gemini, giving the assistant a bigger role before users ever open a design app.

Adobe says its "Adobe for creativity" connector is coming to Gemini in the coming weeks, giving users a way to describe tasks and send them through Adobe tools for imaging, design, and video. Canva is already rolling out its Connected App for Gemini in select English-language markets, with full availability coming soon.

Read more
AI can pass the Turing Test in live chats and appear more human than us. I am spooked now
UC San Diego researchers found GPT-4.5 was judged human 73% of the time in live conversations
Image of a human woman next to an AI-generated face with Real or Fake text at the bottom.

AI can pass the Turing Test in live chats, and the latest result lands with a chill. In a UC San Diego study, GPT-4.5 outperformed real participants at convincing judges there was a person on the other side.

The setup was harder to shrug off than a standard benchmark. Judges reacted to real-time exchanges rather than static prompts, then made a fast call based on conversation alone.

Read more