Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Intel Arc A770M and A550M compete with Nvidia in benchmarks

Add as a preferred source on Google

Intel Arc Alchemist still has a few cards up its sleeves. We’ve seen some of the entry-level lineup so far, both in mobility and desktop forms, but we’ve yet to see much of the flagships. Today, that changes — synthetic benchmarks of the Arc A770M and the A550M have just leaked, giving us a glimpse of what these graphics cards can do in a gaming laptop.

Much like before, Intel Arc Alchemist did a decent job in benchmarks, trading blows with Nvidia’s entry-to-mid-range GPUs. Now, the question is: Can it do equally well in real-world scenarios?

Recommended Videos

Fire Strike Extreme
Intel Arc 770M pic.twitter.com/lZJtSa7giy

— _rogame 🇵🇸 (@_rogame) July 11, 2022

Today’s benchmarks were delivered by @_rogame on Twitter who served up some 3DMark Fire Strike results for Intel Arc. The flagship Arc A770M was found inside the same Clevo gaming laptop we’ve previously reported on. It came paired with an Intel Core i7-12700H CPU. The A550M was part of an Intel reference laptop that Wccftech speculates could be one of the new NUC X15 Alder Country designs. These laptops are going to feature the same Core i7-12700H CPU and an up to Intel Arc A730M GPU.

For the Arc A770M benchmark, the leaker used a test version of Intel’s drivers (version 9999) while the Arc A550M was using the official driver, but an older version of it — it ran version 1726, but the current version is 1734. As for the scores, the Arc A770M managed to hit 13,244 points in the 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme graphics test. This puts it around the same level as the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 in its mobile version, but the performance of the Nvidia GPU varies based on its TGP — there are several variants out there.

The Arc A550M was tested in 3DMark Time Spy, getting 6,017 points. However, these benchmark results are difficult to trust. Not only is it simply a synthetic test, but the Arc A550M was also running Intel’s Advanced Performance Optimization (APO) feature that boosts the results of synthetic benchmarks by up to 15%. We also don’t know whether the Arc A770M received the same treatment and was running APO or not.

An Intel Arc Alchemist laptop with the Arc logo displayed.
Intel

This brings us to the common problem we’ve seen with these Intel Arc benchmarks — the graphics cards seemingly do well in tests, but they fail to impress in gaming. One example of this is the Arc A730M, recently thoroughly tested by a leaker on the Chinese social media platform Weibo. The Arc A730M was able to compete with Nvidia’s RTX 3070 when tested in benchmarks, but it fell painfully flat when the leaker took it out for a spin in a gaming scenario. Unfortunately, today’s leaks don’t deliver any new information as to the gaming capabilities of the cards — the leaker focused on benchmarking.

Intel itself has recently released the official benchmark results for the A730M and the A770M, but those results were skewed in Intel’s favor due to various factors, such as the aforementioned TGP of the GPU in question. Intel compared itself to Nvidia, but the laptops that were used to compete against Intel were not of the same quality as those used for the Intel Arc cards. As such, these benchmarks are still quite irrelevant.

Intel Arc Alchemist has had a slow and rocky start so far. The laptops with the A770M and the A550M are still nowhere to be seen in any major quantities. Therefore, it might be a while before we can get our hands on some trustworthy benchmarks of Intel’s best GPUs. On the other hand, that could be a good thing for Intel at this point — it gives it a bit more time to optimize the drivers and deliver a more impressive product than what we’ve seen so far.

Monica J. White
Monica is a computing writer at Digital Trends, focusing on PC hardware. Since joining the team in 2021, Monica has written…
Apple just raised Mac prices, and Prime Day is your last chance to buy them at old prices
Five MacBook deals at pre-hike prices, while they last.
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

Apple stunned the industry when it launched the MacBook Neo in March 2026 for just $599 ($499 for students), especially as most PC makers were raising prices. Unfortunately, that era is already over. 

On June 25, Apple increased the prices of the MacBook Neo, M5 MacBook Air, and several MacBook Pro models by up to $300. If you've been planning to buy a MacBook, the ongoing Prime Day 2026 sale may be your last opportunity to buy one at the old-time pricing.

Read more
The Macflation crisis is here, and I just dodged it by a hair
Had I been 10 days late, I would have had to spend another $200 to get the same 13-inch M5 MacBook Air.
MacBook Air M5

When Apple finally caved to the memory crisis and increased prices across Mac and iPad on June 25, 2026, most people reacted with disbelief, frustration, or resigned acceptance. Mine was a quiet, slightly wicked smile, and in about two to three minutes, you'll understand exactly why.

My M1 MacBook Air (8GB, 256GB) has been showing its age since last year. It was starting to crack under pressure. Whenever I opened more than 10 or 15 Chrome tabs, it would protest quietly before crashing, forcing me to ration them. Video exports, even casual ones, started taking noticeably longer. I did everything I was supposed to do, but none of it made a meaningful difference.

Read more
Microsoft Copilot can now handle more of your finance work in Excel with reusable skills and data connectors
Live financial data now flows straight into your spreadsheet.
copilot-for-excel-finance

Microsoft just gave Copilot in Excel a serious upgrade for anyone who spends their day buried in spreadsheets. The update centers on three things finance teams actually care about: reusable workflows, live data straight from trusted sources, and a clear record of exactly what Copilot edited in your sheet.

https://twitter.com/satyanadella/status/2070180313654063255?s=46

Read more