Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Legacy Archives

Scientists using nature to design the next generation of drones

Add as a preferred source on Google

The next generation of flying robotic drones may resemble some of nature’s most familiar airborne creatures.

In a special issue of the journal Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 14 research teams released a number of new experimental drone designs, which reportedly possess exquisite flight control and can overcome many of the problems drones may face when navigating urban terrain.

Recommended Videos

The researchers said they took their design cues from nature, by closely examining animals such as birds, bats, insects — and even land dwelling snakes.

“Flying animals can be found everywhere in our cities,” guest editor Dr. David Lentink, from Stanford University, wrote in an opening editorial. “From scavenging pigeons to alcohol-sniffing fruit flies that make precision landings on our wine glasses, these animals have quickly learnt how to control their flight through urban environments to exploit our resources.”

According to the report, one of the biggest challenges facing robotic drones is the ability to survive the elements, such as extreme heat, bitter cold and especially strong winds.  To overcome this issue, a team of researchers studied hawk moths as they battled different whirlwind conditions in a vortex chamber, in order to harness their superior flight control mechanisms.

Another team from Hungary aimed to mimic the flocking of birds, by developing an algorithm that allows drones to huddle together while flying through the air.  And a research team from Harvard constructed a fly-like microbot the size of a one cent coin, which can explore minuscule or very cramped spaces.  Just like the ambidextrous insect, the pint-sized robot can take off and land and hover in the air for an extended period of time.

These drones are meant to be used for numerous applications, from military surveillance and search and rescue efforts to flying camera phones and courier services.  So Amazon want to take some notes.

Loren Grush
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Loren Grush is a science and health writer living in New York City, having written for Fox News Health, Fox News SciTech and…
Scientists pretended to be delusional in AI chats. Grok and Gemini encouraged them.
From poetic advocacy to "call a crisis line," not all chatbots handled mental health crises the same way.
statue hugging its knees

Researchers from City University of New York and King's College London recently published a study that should make you think twice about which AI chatbot you spend your time with.

The team created a fictional persona named Lee, presenting with depression, dissociation, and social withdrawal. They then had Lee interact with five major AI chatbots: GPT-4o, GPT-5.2, Grok 4.1 Fast, Gemini 3 Pro, and Claude Opus 4.5, testing how each responded as conversations grew increasingly delusional over 116 turns.

Read more
Musk’s SpaceX eyes GPU manufacturing as Nvidia’s supply becomes a headache
SpaceX has big GPU dreams and even bigger IPO dream to back them up.
City, Architecture, Building

SpaceX is reportedly planning to manufacture its own GPUs, the chips that power artificial intelligence. The revelation comes from excerpts of its S-1 registration, a document companies file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission before going public. 

As reported by Reuters, SpaceX lists "manufacturing our own GPUs" among its biggest capital expenditures in the future. This comes a month after Elon Musk announced its own TeraFab chip factory focused on developing chips that can survive the harsh conditions of space and power its orbital AI data centers. 

Read more
Autonomous cars were supposed to free us from traffic hell. Research says otherwise
The self-driving dream might just be a traffic nightmare in disguise.
Self driving car from Waymo

Self-driving cars promised a future where you sit back, relax, and glide past the gridlock while the car handles everything. A new study from the University of Texas at Arlington has some bad news for that fantasy. According to research, widespread adoption of autonomous vehicles could actually make traffic significantly worse.

Professors Stephen Mattingly and Farah Naz conducted a meta-analysis on how self-driving cars could affect vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Their findings showed an average 5.95% increase in vehicle miles traveled. Non-shared autonomous vehicles pushed that figure even higher, to nearly 7%. 

Read more