Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Emerging Tech
  4. News

California taps Titan supercomputer to help prepare for the next big quake

Add as a preferred source on Google

In 1906, a magnitude 7.8 earthquake hit San Francisco, killing 700 people and causing some $400 million in property damage. Given that this sort of natural disaster is thought to strike at 150-year intervals, there’s a major impetus for today’s officials to begin strategizing for a similar scenario — and a Titan supercomputer might be able to lend a hand.

One of the biggest challenges facing emergency planners and engineers is a lack of data pertaining to large scale earthquakes. Smaller quakes have been thoroughly documented, but they won’t necessarily reveal the information that’s required to set up the proper counter-measures ahead of a potentially devastating event.

Recommended Videos

To remedy this problem, a team led by the Southern California Earthquake Center’s Thomas Jordan is using the Titan supercomputer at the Oak Ridge National Library to develop physics-based earthquake simulations. Their work will create a seismic hazard map for the state of California, according to a report from Science Daily.

This modern approach to earthquake preparation owes a significant debt to the men and women that logged detailed records of earthquakes many years ago. That data is now being used to test the accuracy of the simulations the team are building.

The team creates the necessary 3D models and physics codes, then runs a simulation of a well-documented historical earthquake. If the ground motions that are being calculated match those on record, they can be confident that their simulations are accurate and that the information being gleaned is usable.

The vast complexity of these simulations means the use of a supercomputer like Titan is essential. The team has been quoted as saying that the project would be impossible without the use of Titan due to the many variables being used in the simulation, and the sheer amount of node hours tests require as a result.

Brad Jones
Brad is an English-born writer currently splitting his time between Edinburgh and Pennsylvania. You can find him on Twitter…
AI may have just won a literary prize. My heart weeps seeing it poison our love for books.
updated book and AI photo

I had a hard time processing this news. As someone who has been deeply in love with stories since childhood and who grew up on the works of Arthur Conan Doyle, Terry Pratchett, J.R.R. Tolkien, and other such venerable authors, seeing an AI-written story win a prestigious writing award is hard to digest. 

If you are unaware, the winners for the Commonwealth Short Story Prize for 2026 were announced, and three of the five winning regional stories have been found to be entirely or partially written by AI. Or at least that seems to be the consensus among readers. As a reader and an amateur fiction writer, this hurt me deeper than any other tale of AI corroding our lives.

Read more
Canva and Adobe are coming to Gemini, and they want to make everything chatty
Adobe and Canva are plugging into Google’s assistant, betting that creative work starts with a prompt, not an app icon
Art, Collage, Photography

Canva and Adobe are moving deeper into Google Gemini, giving the assistant a bigger role before users ever open a design app.

Adobe says its "Adobe for creativity" connector is coming to Gemini in the coming weeks, giving users a way to describe tasks and send them through Adobe tools for imaging, design, and video. Canva is already rolling out its Connected App for Gemini in select English-language markets, with full availability coming soon.

Read more
AI can pass the Turing Test in live chats and appear more human than us. I am spooked now
UC San Diego researchers found GPT-4.5 was judged human 73% of the time in live conversations
Image of a human woman next to an AI-generated face with Real or Fake text at the bottom.

AI can pass the Turing Test in live chats, and the latest result lands with a chill. In a UC San Diego study, GPT-4.5 outperformed real participants at convincing judges there was a person on the other side.

The setup was harder to shrug off than a standard benchmark. Judges reacted to real-time exchanges rather than static prompts, then made a fast call based on conversation alone.

Read more