Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Emerging Tech
  4. Web
  5. News

Study suggests women’s computer code is preferred, only if their gender is unknown

Add as a preferred source on Google

When justifying the conspicuous absence of women in tech, the most commonly offered explanation has always been lack of skill — women are less interested in technology, they don’t pursue it as often (or as early), so by extension, when it comes to job applications, there are fewer qualified women in the mix. How could engineering teams not be majority male? Well, a new study published on PeerJ pokes a pretty damning hole in that argument — according to this research, women write better code than men on GitHub, or at the very least, their contributions are accepted more often by fellow coders. But this is only true when their gender is not known; once it’s made apparent that a woman is behind the syntax, all bets are off. In fact, bets go down.

The study (which has not yet been peer reviewed), involved the analysis of nearly 1.4 million users of open source program-sharing site Github, a platform that is often referenced in job interviews among computer scientists. The 12 million strong developer community does not require that its users provide gender information, but researchers were able to determine the sex of about 1.4 million of them (12 percent), the BBC reports, “either because it was clear from the users’ profiles or because their email addresses could be matched with the Google+ social network.”

Recommended Videos

Based on this information, the team determined that pull requests (code change suggestions) made by women made were accepted four percent more often than those made by men. However, this proportion dropped drastically when a woman’s gender was noticeable. The researchers write, “For outsiders, we see evidence for gender bias: women’s acceptance rates are 71.8% when they use gender neutral profiles, but drop to 62.5% when their gender is identifiable. There is a similar drop for men, but the effect is not as strong.”

“Women have a higher acceptance rate of pull requests overall, but when they’re outsiders and their gender is identifiable, they have a lower acceptance rate than men,” the study shows. “Our results suggest that although women on Github may be more competent overall, bias against them exists nonetheless.”

Considering that major tech companies like Facebook, Google, and Apple all have less than 20 percent of their technical positions filled by women, this is an alarming finding.

So keep coding, ladies. Maybe one day, you’ll be able to identify yourself and claim your fame.

Lulu Chang
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Macbook Neo stress test shows Apple could’ve made it run cooler with a simple fix
This simple mod makes the MacBook Neo faster.
Apple MacBook Neo with users hands on it

Apple's MacBook Neo arrived as a shock to the industry. It is the new cheap MacBook that is designed to be silent, efficient, and affordable. But a new stress test suggests that it could have been noticeably better with a very simple change.

As per a recent test, the addition of a basic copper plate to the cooling setup can improve both thermals and performance by a meaningful margin. And the frustrating part? It isn't some complex engineering overhaul and is relatively straightforward.

Read more
The Mac Pro is dead at Apple, and I’ll miss the cheese-grater powerhouse
RIP Mac Pro. The Mac Studio is taking the throne, and we're okay with that.
Electronics, Computer, Pc

Apple has officially discontinued the Mac Pro. It’s been removed from Apple’s website, and Apple has confirmed to 9to5Mac that there are no plans to release a future version. The buy page now redirects to Apple’s Mac homepage, where the Mac Pro no longer exists.

Why did Apple kill the Mac Pro?

Read more
March Madness, Revisited: The AI Model Did Well. But Mad Things Still Happen
Stills from NCAA games.

(NOTE: This article is part of an ongoing series documenting an experiment with using AI to fill the NCAA brackets and see how it fares against years of human experience. The original article is as follows.)

A week ago, I wrote about entering an NCAA tournament pool with a more disciplined process than I usually use.

Read more