Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Cars
  3. Legacy Archives

McLaren 650S and Lamborghini Huracán go head to head in a drag race

Add as a preferred source on Google

There’s been more than a handful of drag races popping up on line of different match car match-ups. Some have been a little out there, like the Challenger Hellcat racing a Jet while others have been of Tesla’s Model S putting to shame petrol power.

In this latest shootout from the guys at CAR magazine, we get to see something more traditional: two evenly matched supercars duking it out to see which is faster in a straight line. No gimmicks, no poor starts, just a dry road and two cars engaging warp speed from a controlled launch.

Huracan Vs 650S
Image used with permission by copyright holder

In one corner, the Lamborghini’s replacement for the Gallardo, the Huracán LP 610-4. This bad bull sports a 5.2-liter V10, cranking out 610 horsepower and 412 pound-feet of torque to all four wheels via a seven-speed dual clutch gearbox. Lambo quotes a 0 to 62 time of 3.2 seconds and tops out at 202 mph.

Recommended Videos

On the McLaren side, the 650S houses a 3.8-liter twin turbo V8 that produces 641 horsepower and 500 pound-feet of torque. The power is sent to the rear through its own seven-speed dual clutch transmission. This car’s quoted acceleration time is a 0 to 62 of 3 seconds dead.

Of course, what’s on paper doesn’t always translate to real life, so the end result might be different than one would expect. A straight-up drag race also doesn’t necessarily mean the victor will be the fastest around a circuit, either, but it’s still a very important (and exciting) metric of performance.

We won’t spoil the result, but this clean, unambiguous test shows a clear winner. If you want to cut to the chase, jump to the 1:15 mark and watch the super cars fly.

Alexander Kalogianni
Former Automotive Editor
Alex K is an automotive writer based in New York. When not at his keyboard or behind the wheel of a car, Alex spends a lot of…
Slate’s uber-affordable EV goes up pre-orders in June, but we still don’t know the price
Slate’s budget EV truck is almost ready to take your money
Slate EV 3

Slate Auto's minimalist electric truck gets closer to finally rolling out on the roads. The startup has confirmed that preorders are opening on June 24, 2026, for $300. The EV maker has also been taking refundable $50 reservations, and its latest emails to prospective buyers encourage them to reserve now to secure a delivery window before people who wait for the preorder phase.

We have the preorder dates, just not the actual pricing

Read more
Low-cost sodium batteries are already reaching Tesla performance levels in China
Researchers found Hina’s commercial sodium-ion cells match important Tesla battery performance and manufacturing markers.
Tesla Supercharger

A commercial sodium-ion battery already used in China is moving into Tesla-like territory, putting fresh pressure on lithium-ion’s cost advantage.

Researchers testing Hina’s cells found consistent output across a large sample, high power capability, and a design that echoes key choices in Tesla batteries. The low-cost sodium battery still has work ahead, especially around charging in freezing conditions, but it points to a cheaper path for EVs, grid storage, and commercial vehicles that don’t need maximum driving range.

Read more
Tesla’s top rival launches self-driving with full crash coverage at a fraction of the cost
BYD's God's Eye tech is coming for Tesla with a much smaller bill
BYD 2026 Seagull.

BYD just delivered another blow to Tesla. The company's new self-driving package just dropped with a price tag that basically embarrasses Tesla's driver-assistance service. The Chinese EV giant announced a new service package dubbed God's Eye, with chairman Wang Chuanfu claiming BYD's first goal is to achieve "zero traffic accidents."

In a recent press conference, he announced that BYD will fully cover compensation and repairs for accidents that happen while drivers are using its City Navigation function, without affecting the user’s insurance premiums the following year.

Read more