Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Reviews

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

HP Pavilion Laptop 16 Review

Add as a preferred source on Google
HP Pavilion Laptop 16 rear view showing lid and logo.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends
HP Pavilion Laptop 16
MSRP $650.00
“The HP Pavilion 16 is a decent 16-inch machine, as long as you buy it on sale.”
Pros
  • Reasonably solid build
  • Good enough performance
  • Attractive sale price
  • Comfortable keyboard
Cons
  • IPS display has poor colors
  • Battery life is just okay

“Why you can trust Digital Trends – We have a 20-year history of testing, reviewing, and rating products, services and apps to help you make a sound buying decision. Find out more about how we test and score products.“

I’ve been reviewing more budget laptops lately, or at least those that are near-budget at $1,000 or less. That’s on purpose, because not everybody has $1,500 or more to spend on a laptop. HP’s Pavilion lineup, which will be transitioning to the budget version of its new OmniBook line that covers all the company’s consumer machines, has served that kind of consumer in the past.

Recommended Videos

Right now, the Pavilion Laptop 16 is a machine that people might look to for a large-format laptop that won’t break the bank. And it has a number of features that straddle the fence between premium and budget but aren’t quite midrange, either. The problem is, the Pavilion Laptop 16 starts at $1,100, where it seems like it should be offered at a few hundred dollars less.

Update: This review was originally written based on incorrect pricing information. When considering the more accurate price, the laptop is a lot more attractive.

Specs and configuration

HP Pavilion Laptop 16
Dimensions 14.08 x 10.03 x 0.70 inches
Weight 3.92 pounds
Display 16.0-inch 16:10 FHD+ (1920 x 1200) IPS, 60Hz, touch or non-touch
CPU Intel Core Ultra 7 155U
GPU Intel Iris Xe
Memory 16GB
32GB
Storage 512GB SSD
1TB SSD
2TB SSD
Ports 2 x USB-C
2 x USB-A
1 x HDMI 2.1
1 x 3.5mm audio jack
Camera 720p with infrared camera for Windows 11 Hello
Wireless Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3
Battery 59 watt-hour
Operating system Windows 11
Price Buy at HP Instant Ink (US)

The Pavilion Laptop 16 starts at $650 for a Core Ultra 7 155U, 16GB of RAM, a 512GB SSD, and a 16.0-inch FHD+ IPS display (with or without touch). If you go by the standard HP configurator, the price starts at $1,100, and upgrades to 32GB of RAM and a 2TB SSD raise the price to $1,509.

At $650, the Pavilion Laptop 16 is a lot more attractive than its list price, which would be too too expensive. So, as long as you can get it at the sale price, you can feel comfortable in giving it some consideration.

Design

HP Pavilion Laptop 16 front angled view showing display and keyboard.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

The Pavilion Laptop 16 is constructed of all aluminum, and it’s reasonably solid. There’s a little bit of bendiness in the lid and the keyboard deck depresses a little under pressure. But overall, the build quality is fine. HP’s OmniBook lineup is a lot more solid, though, and they’re not that much more expensive (or around the same price).

The machine is also fairly large, with plastic bezels that are thin along the edges but rather large on top and bottom. That makes the Pavilion Laptop 16 fairly side and deep, although it’s reasonably thin at 0.70 inches and it’s just under four pounds in weight. You can get smaller and thinner 16-inch laptops, with the Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 being a prime example at just 0.50 inches thick and 3.73 pounds.

Aesthetically, the Pavilion Laptop 16 is very plain, and that’s fine. Many laptops today have minimalist designs with no bling. I keep referring to HP’s own OmniBook lineup, because the company knows how to make elegant laptops that are also simple in design. This one is not the best example of that, though.

Keyboard and touchpad

HP Pavilion Laptop 16 top down view showing keyboard and touchpad.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

HP makes some great keyboards, most notably the excellent version they used on their older Spectre lineup and most recently on the new OmniBook machines. This one isn’t quite the same. Its keycaps are a little small, and while there’s a lot of key spacing, the switches are too loose. It’s not a bad keyboard, exactly, it’s just that HP has done a lot better.

The touchpad is smaller than it could be given the available space on the palm rest, and it works well enough as a mechanical version with reasonably quiet button clicks. It’s not bad, either, but not as good as the excellent haptic touchpad HP uses on some of its machines.

Connectivity and webcam

The Pavilion Laptop 16 is a large laptop and so there’s plenty of room for connectivity. While there’s a large selection of ports, it’s disappointing that none are Thunderbolt 4. Once again, I’m reminded that this is a near-budget laptop in design, and at $650, some compromises are necessary. Wireless connectivity is just one step behind, which is fine.

The webcam is the first I’ve seen in a while that’s less than 1080p, at just 720p. Its image isn’t great, and the Core Ultra 7 155U chipset doesn’t have a fast Neural Processing Unit (NPU) to support any on-device AI features. There’s an infrared camera for Windows 11 Hello facial recognition, which worked well.

Performance

HP Pavilion Laptop 16 top-down view showing speakers.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155U is a 15-watt chipset that’s Intel’s previous generation chipset. It has 12 cores (two Performance, eight efficient, and two Low-Power Efficient) and 14 threads, running at up t0 4.8GHz. It’s been superseded by Intel’s Core Ultra Series 2 (Lunar Lake) and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X chipsets that are aimed at much better efficiency. While you can get the newer chipsets for around twice the price, not everyone will be willing to pay that much.

The second problem is that the Pavilion Laptop 16’s performance doesn’t stand out. It’s considerably slower than Lunar Lake and even more so than Qualcomm’s latest chipsets. It’s okay for basic productivity tasks, but it’s not going to keep up with other contemporary laptops. As we’ll see, it also doesn’t have the efficiency benefits of Lunar Lake, so there’s no good reason for the compromise. And, its Intel Iris Xe integrated graphics aren’t very fast, meaning it’s not a great choice for gamers or creators.

Handbrake
(seconds)
Geekbench 6
(single/multi)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme
HP Pavilion Laptop 16
(Core Ultra 7 155U / Intel Iris Xe)
123 2261 / 9729 2529
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i
(Core i5-1235U / Intel Iris Xe)
139 2228 / 8287 2971
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED
(Ryzen 5 7530U / Radeon graphics)
121 1488 / 8207 N/A
Acer Swift Go 14 AI
(Snapdragon X Plus / Adreno)
N/A 2413 / 11388 3231
Acer Swift 14 AI
(Core Ultra 7 258V / Intel Arc 140V)
92 2755 / 11138 5294
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
(Core Ultra 7 258V / Intel Arc 140V)
99 2483 / 10725 7573
HP Spectre x360 14
(Core Ultra 7 155H / Intel Arc)
83 2176 / 11980 N/A
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Aura Edition
(Core Ultra 7 258V / Intel Arc 140V)
88 2485 / 10569 5217
Asus Zenbook S 14
(Core Ultra 7 258V / Intel Arc 140V)
N/A 2738 / 10734 7514
HP OmniBook X
(Snapdragon X Elite / Adreno)
N/A 2377 / 13490 6165
MacBook Air
(M3)
109 3102 / 12078 8098

Battery life

HP Pavilion Laptop 16 side view showing ports and lid.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155U chipset is a member of the previous generation that wasn’t as focused on efficiency as newer chipsets like Intel’s Lunar Lake and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X. But, it’s the lower-power version of its generation, so when combine with a low-resolution IPS display but only 59 watt-hours of battery capacity, I wasn’t entirely sure what to expect.

I’ve provided more than a few comparison laptops to give an idea of what to expect from the Pavilion Laptop 16. It didn’t do badly, exactly, compared to earlier laptops, but it’s nowhere near the current crop of machines. You won’t get nearly a day’s worth of battery life, even running basic tasks, compared to many other laptops that will get a full day and then some.

Web browsing Video
HP Pavilion Laptop 16
(Core Ultra 7 155U)
6 hours 9 minutes 10 hours, 15 minutes
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i
(Core Ultra i5-1235U)
4 hours, 47 minutes 9 hours, 24 minutes
HP Spectre x360 14
(Core Ultra 7 155H)
7 hours, 9 minutes 14 hours, 22 minutes
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED
(Ryzen 5 7530U)
12 hours, 13 minutes 17 hours, 19 minutes
Acer Swift Go 14 AI
(Snapdragon X Plus)
15 hours, 29 minutes 21 hours, 38 minutes
Acer Swift 14 AI
(Core Ultra 7 258V)
17 hours, 22 minutes 24 hours, 10 minutes
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
(Core Ultra 7 258V)
11 hours, 5 minutes 15 hours, 46 minutes
Asus Zenbook S 14
(Core Ultra 7 258V)
16 hours, 47 minutes 18 hours, 35 minutes
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7
(Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100)
14 hours, 21 minutes 22 hours, 39 minutes
HP Omnibook X
(Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100)
13 hours, 37 minutes 22 hours, 4 minutes
Apple MacBook Air
(Apple M3)
19 hours, 38 minutes 19 hours, 39 minutes

Display

Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

The Pavilion Laptop 16 has just one display option, a 16.0-inch 16:10 FHD+ (1920 x 1200) IPS panel running at 60Hz, which is available with and without touch. That’s not high enough resolution for me at this screen size, with text that comes across as quite pixellated. The display seems plenty bright and blacks aren’t too gray, so those are plusses. But, colors did seem muted to me.

My colorimeter confirmed those impressions. Brightness is definitely great at 404 nits, and contrast exceeds our 1,000:1 threshold at 1,210:1. That’s not OLED-level of inky blacks, but it’s good for IPS technology. Colors, though, weren’t very wide, at just 69% of sRGB, 49% of AdobeRGB, and 49% of DCI-P3, where average IPS displays today come in at 100%, 75%, and 75%, respectively. And color accuracy wasn’t very good at a DeltaE of 2.70, where productivity users want 2.0 or better.

Something has to give to fit a large-screen laptop below $700. Quite often, it’s the display.

A near-budget laptop that demands (and gets) a near-budget price

This entire review assumes that you can get the Pavilion Laptop 16 at a sale price, such as when this review is written at $650. It’s fast enough for most productivity users, and it’s built well enough. But its battery life isn’t great and its display just isn’t colorful enough to spend a lot more money.

But, if you need a large laptop and don’t have a lot of money, then the Pavilion Laptop 16 is well worth considering. You’ll get a laptop that’s reasonably pleasant to use and won’t break the bank. But make sure to wait for a sale, because the laptop won’t be worth it at list price.

Mark Coppock
Former Computing Writer
Mark Coppock is a Freelance Writer at Digital Trends covering primarily laptop and other computing technologies. He has…
Don’t try this $3 app that makes your MacBook moan, but I know you want to
This absurd $3 Mac app went viral for all the wrong reasons
Computer, Electronics, Laptop, MacBook

There are useful apps, there are pointless app,s and then there is SlapMac, which sits in a category all by itself.

This app has gone viral online for one very stupid (and fun) reason: it makes your MacBook play sound effects when you slap it. Just spank your Mac and hear it moan, fart, or throw punches. The app creator has apparently made $5,000 in just three days, which is what makes the story even more absurd.

Read more
Apple’s ridiculous $700 wheels for its desktop PC are gone for good
The $700 Apple wheels are dead, long live ridiculous tech accessories
Machine, Wheel, Tire, Apple Mac Pro Wheels

Apple has officially discontinued the Mac Pro, and by extension, the $700 Mac Pro Wheels Kit is also dead.

Yes, that sentence is still funny in 2026. It marks the end of one of the company's most infamous desktop add-ons. For anyone who somehow missed this saga, the Wheels Kit launched back in 2020 as an upgrade for the Mac Pro. It allowed you to add wheels for $400, but buying the standalone kit later costs a whopping $700 because the base machine already included the standard feet. Apple also sold a separate $300 Feet Kit for people who wanted to swap back.

Read more
Macbook Neo stress test shows Apple could’ve made it run cooler with a simple fix
This simple mod makes the MacBook Neo faster.
Apple MacBook Neo with users hands on it

Apple's MacBook Neo arrived as a shock to the industry. It is the new cheap MacBook that is designed to be silent, efficient, and affordable. But a new stress test suggests that it could have been noticeably better with a very simple change.

As per a recent test, the addition of a basic copper plate to the cooling setup can improve both thermals and performance by a meaningful margin. And the frustrating part? It isn't some complex engineering overhaul and is relatively straightforward.

Read more