Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Chinese AI lab says it can match Anthropic’s all-poweful Claude Mythos at sniffing security bugs

Security researchers say Z.ai's latest model can rival Anthropic's Mythos in one critical area.

Add as a preferred source on Google
China Z.Ai GLM-5.2 Featured Banner
Z.Ai

For the past few weeks, Anthropic’s Mythos has been viewed as the gold standard for AI-powered cybersecurity. That lead may already be shrinking. According to a new report from The Wall Street Journal, security researchers say Chinese AI startup Z.ai’s GLM-5.2 can now match Mythos when it comes to finding software security vulnerabilities, even if it still trails Anthropic and OpenAI in broader reasoning tasks.

GLM-5.2 is closing the gap in one very important area

As per the report, researchers found GLM-5.2 performs on par with Mythos in identifying software bugs, a capability that’s becoming increasingly important as companies race to patch vulnerabilities before hackers can exploit them. The model is also open-source, meaning anyone can download, modify, and run it on their own hardware without relying on a cloud provider. That flexibility makes it attractive for enterprises, but it also raises concerns that cybercriminals could adapt it for offensive purposes.

The report is careful to point out that this doesn’t mean China has overtaken the U.S. in AI overall. GLM-5.2 still lags behind Anthropic and OpenAI across many general-purpose tasks. But in cybersecurity, where even small improvements can have outsized real-world consequences, the performance gap has narrowed dramatically. According to benchmark data cited by the Journal, GLM-5.2 has even outperformed Claude Opus 4.8 in some security evaluations, while researchers say additional prompting allows it to reach Mythos-level bug-finding performance.

The bigger story isn’t who wins. It’s how fast the gap is closing

Interestingly, this all comes at a rather awkward time for the U.S. AI industry. While companies like Anthropic and OpenAI have spent the past few weeks restricting access to their most advanced frontier models over national security concerns, Chinese labs have been racing in the opposite direction by releasing increasingly capable open-weight alternatives that anyone can download and run.

The funny thing is that this debate was already playing out in public. Just days ago, Elon Musk predicted Chinese AI labs would probably catch up to Anthropic’s flagship Fable 5 by Q1 2027, at least in terms of benchmark performance. Zhipu AI founder Tang Jie quickly pushed back, replying, “won’t take that long.” Musk then clarified his position, arguing that while China might match Anthropic on benchmarks by then, achieving the same level of “true usefulness” would be a much tougher milestone, crediting Anthropic’s focus on practical intelligence.

On benchmarks, yes, but as measured by true usefulness even Q1 would be very impressive.

Anthropic has rightly focused on maximizing useful intelligence, which does not show up in benchmarks, but definitely shows up in revenue.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 18, 2026

Now, The Wall Street Journal’s latest report gives Tang’s optimism a little more weight. Instead of talking about coding benchmarks, it suggests GLM-5.2 is already matching Anthropic’s Mythos at finding security vulnerabilities, arguably one of the most valuable real-world AI applications today. That doesn’t suddenly make China the leader in frontier AI, but one thing is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore: the AI race is no longer a comfortable lead for the United States.

Varun Mirchandani
Varun is an experienced technology journalist and editor with over eight years in consumer tech media. His work spans…
AI chatbots can often feed into your delusions. Researchers say you should look for three signs
Experts warn that chatbot design choices can reinforce unhealthy beliefs in vulnerable users.
ChatGPT on a smartphone

Artificial intelligence chatbots have become incredibly good at sounding human. But a new review paper by psychiatrist Marc Augustin and fellow researchers Thomas A. Pollak and Helen Morrin, published in NPP—Digital Psychiatry and Neuroscience, argues that existing AI research points to an overlooked psychological risk. The paper, highlighted by The Wall Street Journal, reviews previous studies and proposes a framework explaining how three common chatbot behaviors can combine to reinforce delusional thinking in vulnerable users, creating what the authors call an "amplification spiral."

Researchers say these are the three warning signs

Read more
Lost access to your crypto wallet? Don’t Google your way out of it
Security researchers warn that fake recovery tools are becoming the latest trap for crypto owners.
Bitcoin crypto wallet featured

Forgetting the recovery phrase to a crypto wallet can be stressful enough. Unfortunately, that's exactly the moment scammers are waiting for. A new warning highlights a growing scam in which cybercriminals disguise malware as cryptocurrency recovery software, tricking desperate users into handing over far more than just access to their wallets.

The fake recovery tool that's actually malware

Read more
Apple Books apparently has the same knockoff problem as Amazon
WSJ's Joanna Stern says copycat AI books based on her work continue to pop up on the platform.
updated book and AI photo

Apple Books has long been viewed as a cleaner alternative to Amazon's Kindle Store. But if a new investigation is anything to go by, it may be fighting the same battle against AI-generated junk. In a recent YouTube Shorts video, The Wall Street Journal's Joanna Stern revealed that fake, AI-generated versions of her book have repeatedly appeared on Apple Books, despite being reported and removed.

Joanna Stern says fake copies keep coming back

Read more