Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Gaming
  3. Features

Call of Duty’s Godzilla vs. Kong event doesn’t match the hype

Add as a preferred source on Google

One of the most important aspects of a live-service game is its ability to keep players engaged for long periods of time. This can be done in a multitude of ways, but a common trend is to implement limited-time events that aim to attract players. Call of Duty: Warzone, one of the most popular free-to-play live-service games, has heavily relied on its seasonal events, most recently with the implementation of Godzilla and King Kong.

The event, titled Operation Monarch, launched on May 10 and allows players to battle alongside the massive monsters. While the event itself was intriguing and fun at times, the marketing leading up to Operation Monarch was highly misleading, due in part to the fact that King Kong and Godzilla don’t fight one another at all. Instead, the two beasts simply wander around the map, aimlessly, which has sparked a major sense of disappointment.

Recommended Videos

Misleading marketing

Operation Monarch Official Teaser feat. Godzilla vs. Kong | Call of Duty: Warzone

The Operation Monarch event sends 60 players to Caldera, with the goal of being the last squad standing. The catch is that Godzilla and King Kong — known as Titans in-game — roam the island and can take players out with ease. As you collect loot and damage the Titans, you’ll earn intel that eventually accumulates and turns into rewards such as a Loadout Drop, Gas Mask, or even a controllable killstreak that allows you to actually command the two creatures (which is admittedly really cool) to attack other players.

King Kong punching Godzilla in Warzone.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The mode itself has a slew of problems, but right out of the gate, the most egregious issue is that King Kong and Godzilla don’t battle one another, despite the trailers making it seem like that’s what would happen. Many fans expected it to play out almost like one of Splatoon’s Splatfest events, wherein the community has to pick between two teams — in this case, Team Godzilla or Team Kong — to battle it out for the duration of the event.

Instead, the limited time mode (LTM) feels more like regular Resurgence Battle Royale, with a sprinkle of Kong and Godzilla on top, rather than the monsters being the focus. There’s literally a shot in one of the teaser trailers that shows King Kong squaring up against Godzilla, so it’s easy to see why the community was upset when this didn’t take place in the actual event.

Missing the mark

To get a sense of what the community thought about the event, Warzone streamer and influencer ModernWarzone released a poll. Of the 24,194 people surveyed, over 70% voted that the Operation Monarch event was a “loss.” It’s a small sample size, but given the overwhelming results, it’s an informative snapshot of the event’s general reception.

Was #OperationMonarch a W or an L?

— ModernWarzone (@ModernWarzone) May 11, 2022

One of Activision’s priorities with Warzone is to keep newcomers engaged, which can be tricky due to how complex the game is. With the Operation Monarch event, a newcomer or casual player might still get absolutely decimated during a match depending on who they get paired against. Experienced players can easily sit back, fire away at one of the Titans, and rack up intel to eventually get their own custom loadout, which can be used to easily take out players who don’t know what they’re doing. In this regard, it’s an appealing premise for experienced players, but the casuals will likely have a rough time.

Because this mode plays like a worse version of standard Battle Royale, there isn’t much reason to revisit it after a few matches. Sure, the spectacle of seeing the two massive Titans is enjoyable, but it quickly gets old since there isn’t a ton of substance in this mode. It would have been interesting if Activision implemented something that played out more cinematically, especially since the stars are supposed to be the two giants. Perhaps giving players the ability to land on top of the creatures to battle one another could have made it feel special. Maybe we could have seen a similar version of what’s in the game now, but with the ability to power up the Titans, allowing them to duke it out.

Fortnite shows the way

Despite all of my criticisms, I recognize it’s tricky to effectively blend massive monsters into a seemingly grounded military shooter — especially from a developmental standpoint. Considering Warzone is only a couple of years old, it stands to reason that developer Raven Software (and other support teams) are still learning what works and what doesn’t. In this case, figuring out a way to please all players is a massive undertaking. Players are often willing to forgive a developer for missteps here and there — the main issue is that the trailers didn’t match the final product.

Ultimately, Operation Monarch isn’t the worst event Warzone has received. Warzone has a history of terrible events such as the Vanguard reveal, which required players to simply fire at a train for an excruciatingly long time. So compared to that event, Operation Monarch is an improvement, though the bar is admittedly low.

Given the precedent set by Fortnite, which features large-scale events that are typically met with a positive reception, it’s easy to see why players would be underwhelmed with the Warzone’s Operation Monarch. Activision should look to the way Fortnite does its events — particularly its large-scale modes that feature cooperative gameplay — and take notes for Warzone. Something like the massive Fortnite Galactus event that allowed players to enjoy a more guided experience was fantastic, so perhaps Activision could add its own spin on a similar formula to make something compelling. Operation Monarch was certainly a step in the right direction, but Activision still has a lot of improvements to make when it comes to Warzone’s events.

Joseph Yaden
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Joseph Yaden is a freelance journalist who covers Nintendo, shooters, and horror games. He mostly covers game guides for…
Topics
The new MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ is chasing console-quality gaming on the go
The world's first Intel Arc G3 Extreme-powered handheld is bold, purple, and ready to game.
Claw 8 EX AI+

MSI has taken the wraps off its latest handheld gaming device at Computex 2026, and it looks like a big step forward for portable PC gaming. Dubbed the Claw 8 EX AI+, the new model is powered by Intel's Arc G3 Extreme processor, making it the first gaming handheld to use Intel's new platform designed specifically for handheld devices.

The company says the new chip brings a major boost to graphics performance while maintaining the power efficiency needed for longer gaming sessions. If these claims turn out to be true, it could become the handheld gaming console to look out for, especially after the Steam Deck received a nearly 50% price hike. 

Read more
Cherry XTRFY K63W Pro Compact is a wireless gaming keyboard that leaves lag behind
Ultra-Wideband tech and 8000 Hz polling are here to end your wireless woes for good.
Cherry XTRFY K63W Pro Compact keyboard

Cherry XTRFY announced the K63W Pro Compact at Computex 2026, and the standout feature is one you don't often see in gaming keyboards: Ultra-Wideband technology. With a true 8000 Hz polling rate, this compact keyboard is positioning itself as a serious wireless option for gamers who don't want to compromise on performance.

What is Ultra-Wideband doing in a keyboard?

Read more
Gaming study says skill-based matchmaking is fair, but it also quietly drives players away
Equal-skill matches can frustrate players over time, while smarter matchmaking kept users engaged longer.
Multiple players dueling in Elden Ring.

Skill-based matchmaking was built to make competitive games feel legitimate. A new study says that balance can carry a hidden cost, because equal-skill contests can create the kind of losing streaks that push people out of the queue.

The research, published in Management Science, argues that game matchmaking works better when it looks beyond raw ability and accounts for how people react to recent wins, losses, and competitive patterns. In an analysis of 5.4 million Lichess matches, optimized matchmaking lifted engagement by 4% to 6% compared with conventional skill-based approaches.

Read more