Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Mobile
  4. Social Media
  5. Features

I paid Meta to ‘verify’ me — here’s what actually happened

Add as a preferred source on Google
An Instagram profile on an iPhone.
Phil Nickinson / Digital Trends

In the fall of 2023 I decided to do a little experiment in the height of the “blue check” hysteria. Twitter had shifted from verifying accounts based (more or less) on merit or importance and instead would let users pay for a blue checkmark. That obviously went (and still goes) badly. Meanwhile, Meta opened its own verification service earlier in the year, called Meta Verified.

Mostly aimed at “creators,” Meta Verified costs $15 a month and helps you “establish your account authenticity and help[s] your community know it’s the real us with a verified badge.” It also gives you “proactive account protection” to help fight impersonation by (in part) requiring you to use two-factor authentication. You’ll also get direct account support “from a real person,” and exclusive features like stickers and stars.

Recommended Videos

You can argue that much of that should be table stakes. Instagram and Facebook already make money off you, even if you’re not verified. Shouldn’t they help protect your account even if you don’t pay extra? And to be clear, you can — and should — enable two-factor authentication on Meta-owned Facebook and Instagram, whether or not you’re verified. And I opined at the time that Meta Verified really was just a money grab, especially because Facebook already had required me to verify my account using my driver’s license or passport — and by mailing a code to my home address — to allow me to purchase political ads for some work I did in the 2016 and 2020 election cycles.

In other words, Facebook already knew I am who I say I am. But I was curious. Would I get anything extra by paying Meta another $180 a year for a blue checkmark? Would I get anything else out of it? I do a little photography work as a side hustle. Would my Instagram account see a boost? Would there be any other surprises?

Screenshots of the Meta Verified process.
An abbreviated look at the Meta Verified process on an iPhone. Phil Nickinson / Digital Trends

I started the experiment in late October 2023. Turning on Meta Verified was simple enough. A few taps through the Meta Verified setup process. Scan my ID. Pay the subscription fee.(I do it through Apple’s subscription mechanism).

And that was it.

I had about 3,100 Instagram followers when I turned on Meta Verified. From basically mid-November through mid-January, things were flat. No growth. At least not just because I started paying Meta $15 a month. I’m not a particularly prolific poster on the gram. Stories mostly, and only a dozen or so full posts. A bunch of stories, though. I never really got into the Reels craze, particularly when Instagram was boosting the heck out of them to try to compete with TikTok. (And I’m not on TikTok. Because I am old.)

Screenshots of two Instagram profiles.
My Instagram followers grew not because I was verified, but because I posted something people liked. Phil Nickinson / Digital Trends

Things got crazy in January. It’s a big month for us, professionally, with CES in Las Vegas. On my way to the airport, I was lucky to get to attend a concert sponsored by JBL, which does pretty big shows every year. This year? Green Day, just ahead of their newest album, and right before the publicity push that precedes a major drop like that. So, up went some stories. Up went some reels.

I’ve gained about 1,500 followers since then. (And I’m sure we’re all close and personal friends now, or will be soon.) One of the reels — bassist Mike Dirnt doing the opening line for Longview — blew up and has eclipsed 1 million views. Another — a line from American Idiot — has done a more modest 60,000 views.

My daughter asked what I was going to do once the Longview reel hit a million. I thought about retiring, but then remembered that I don’t actually get anything out of this, except for the entertainment value of the comments. (Some folks get the joke. Others don’t. And the American Idiot comments went exactly as I expected.)

Meanwhile, as far as I know, my account hasn’t really been any more secure than before. (I presume there’s some algorithm watching over me, though certainly not as closely as if I had an account with any real popularity.) Other posts haven’t seen unsurprising growth. My kids still think I’m old. My wife still thinks I’m silly. They’re both right.

The success of those two reels probably just came down to the universal truth of “creating.” Make good stuff. It’s what Google has always said about websites. It’s all that matters (or should matter), whether you’re writing or shooting photos and video. Or acting. Or whatever. Make. Good. Stuff.

Paying an extra $15 a month for a blue checkmark ultimately did exactly what I expected — nothing. My kids, in fact, think it’s lame to pay for that sort of vanity. (They were similarly unimpressed when I informed them I was organically verified on Google+, back in the day.)

I might leave it turned on a little longer. It’s a couple fewer coffees a month. I get to look like one of the cool kids.

And I can sleep better knowing Meta knows I am who I say I am. Even though it damned well already knew that.

Phil Nickinson
Former Section Editor, Audio/Video
Phil spent the 2000s making newspapers with the Pensacola (Fla.) News Journal, the 2010s with Android Central and then the…
Android apps can now track your habits and whereabouts to offer task suggestions
Contextual Suggestions is Android acting on what it already knows, and the fact that most users will never find the off switch is exactly why you should pay attention.
Google Pixel 10a in the hands of a person.

Google just flipped a switch on Android phones, and you probably didn’t notice. A feature called Contextual Suggestions is currently rolling out to Android devices, enabled by default. 

It does what the name implies: watching what you do, learning your habits, and using the information to provide you with contextual suggestions or actions that you might perform next (via compatible apps). 

Read more
I tested Honor 600 Pro’s AI Image to Video 2.0, and it’s better than I expected
I went in skeptical. I came out impressed.
Honor 600 Pro in hand showing Image to Video feature on screen.

Alright, before you balk at the idea, hear me out. AI is everywhere, and in a fashion that an average screen-hooked modern human won't always appreciate. But amidst the hailstorm of AI integrations, there are a few nuggets of joy. Effortlessly turning stills into a short clip is one such trick that I wish I could use, without any intrusive permissions or token shenanigans, of course.

I stumbled into this perk on my current daily driver, the Honor 600 Pro, and the results have been pleasing. It's not exactly a fresh trick. But what arrested my attention is the refined form that Honor is presenting it. No sign-up hassles. A neat integration in the system gallery. And a straightforward conversion. There's even a dedicated key on the phone that instantly takes you into this AI image transformation.

Read more
Qualcomm leak suggests we have entered the ludicrous era of pricey phones
Your next Android flagship could cost more because of one tiny chip
Snapdragon 8 Elite

We have reached the point where the processor inside a flagship phone may cost as much as an entire budget Android phone. That sounds absurd, but it also feels exactly like where premium phones are headed. Samsung already raised the Galaxy S26’s starting price by $100 over the Galaxy S25, and the next wave of Android flagships could climb even higher.

According to a new leak from tipster Abhishek Yadav, Qualcomm’s upcoming Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro could cost upward of $300, significantly raising the bill of materials for next-generation Android flagships.

Read more