Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Legacy Archives

Google+ traffic up, but still struggling

Add as a preferred source on Google
google-plus-logo
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Google+ traffic is up 3 percent, according to data from Web analytics firm Experian Hitwise. The site also saw its third best traffic week since the fledgling social network went live back in June, with 6.8 million visiting during the week ending November 12. Despite this, far fewer users have visited the site since it peaked in the middle of September.

The Los Angeles Times reports that US traffic to Google+ has fallen during 11 of the 21 weeks it has been available to the public. Each down week saw traffic dive between 10 and 20 percent.

Recommended Videos

While the downturn is notable, it must be noted that Google+ traffic is still much higher than it was prior to September 20, when the Google dropped the invitation requirement for joining, and opened its social network up to anyone who wanted to give it a go. During its first open week, traffic skyrocketed a whopping 1,269 percent. Starting on roughly September 24, the site’s highest traffic day by far, users began abandoning the site, the data shows.

The decline continued through October. But starting on November 7, the downward trend reversed, as users began returning to the site, giving it a 30 percent boost in traffic. While Hitwise doesn’t say so specifically, it’s likely that the launch of Pages, which are profiles designed specifically for brands and businesses to use, is the cause of the upturn in traffic, as Pages launched on the same day.

Of course, the future of Google+ remains very much in question. Though the social network already benefits from referral traffic from other Google properties, the company has begun integrating into more and more products, including the newly-released Android 4.0 “Ice Cream Sandwich” mobile operating system, and with products like Google Music, which lets users share songs with their Google+ friends.

Andrew Couts
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
Topics
YouTube is coming for celebrity deepfakes with new AI likeness detection tech
Celebrity deepfakes are in YouTube’s crosshairs with new AI detection tools
Phone in hand showing YouTube logo

YouTube is cracking down on celebrity deepfakes, and this time around, it is not just talking about the problem in vague platform-safety terms. In a new blog post, YouTube announced that it is expanding its likeness detection technology to the entertainment industry.

So now, the tools will be accessible to talent agencies and management companies for the celebrities they represent. This tool works in a way that is similar to Content ID, but rather than matching copyrighted media, it looks for AI-generated content using a person's likeness and gives eligible participants the ability to find that content and request removal.

Read more
Meta wants you to pay for WhatsApp now, and it’s already testing the waters
WhatsApp

WhatsApp has been free for over a decade, but Meta is starting to change that. The company is testing a paid subscription tier called WhatsApp Plus, and if you haven't heard about it yet, you probably will soon. The rollout was first spotted by WABetaInfo, and Meta's own Help Center page has since confirmed some of the details. 

So, what do you actually get?

Read more
Tinder wants to check your humanity by gazing into an orb. Yes, you read that right
Staring into an orb to prove you are human is no longer science fiction.
tinder-world-id-human-verification

Online dating is already a trust minefield, and now Tinder wants to add an eyeball scan to the mix. The popular dating app has announced a global partnership with World, the biometric identity company founded by OpenAI's Sam Altman. To prove you are a real human on Tinder, you will soon have the option to get your eyes scanned by a physical orb device.

What is World ID and how does Tinder's human verification work?

Read more