Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Yet another global study says Instagram and Tiktok are bad for your mental health

Instagram and TikTok are back in the spotlight — for the wrong reasons.

Add as a preferred source on Google
TikTok
TikTok Unsplash

If you feel like you’ve heard this before, that’s because you probably have. A new global study tied to the World Happiness Report 2026 once again ties popular social media like Instagram and TikTok to poorer mental health outcomes, especially with younger people.

The report finds that these platforms, which are driven by algorithmic feeds and influencer content, tend to have a more negative impact on mental wellbeing compared to apps focused on communication like WhatsApp and Facebook. So not all social media is being treated equally anymore.

Why screen time isn’t the only problem now

Recommended Videos

In the report, one of the key takeaways is that how people use social media matters more than how much they use it. The study states that platforms centered around passive scrolling and curated content are more strongly associated with lower life satisfaction.

On the other hand, apps that are based on direct communication and social interactions show more positive or neutral effects on mental wellbeing. The report also notes that moderate usage (around an hour a day) is linked to better than excessive or no use at all.

Youth are the most vulnerable

The impact appears to be strongest among younger users. Data cited in the report shows that heavy social media use is linked to lower happiness levels. Adolescents who spent several hours a day on social media saw significantly lower life satisfaction. This effect is especially noticeable among teenage girls.

The World Happiness Report points to overwhelming evidence of harm at scale, with direct effects like cyberbullying and indirect effects such as anxiety. As more global studies reach similar conclusions, it has become increasingly clear that these algorithm-driven platforms are responsible for declining mental health.

Countries like Australia have already started restricting access to these platforms, and it appears that even app stores and search engines aren’t safe.

Vikhyaat Vivek
Vikhyaat Vivek is a tech journalist and reviewer with seven years of experience covering consumer hardware, with a focus on…
Meta wants you to pay for WhatsApp now, and it’s already testing the waters
WhatsApp

WhatsApp has been free for over a decade, but Meta is starting to change that. The company is testing a paid subscription tier called WhatsApp Plus, and if you haven't heard about it yet, you probably will soon. The rollout was first spotted by WABetaInfo, and Meta's own Help Center page has since confirmed some of the details. 

So, what do you actually get?

Read more
Tinder wants to check your humanity by gazing into an orb. Yes, you read that right
Staring into an orb to prove you are human is no longer science fiction.
tinder-world-id-human-verification

Online dating is already a trust minefield, and now Tinder wants to add an eyeball scan to the mix. The popular dating app has announced a global partnership with World, the biometric identity company founded by OpenAI's Sam Altman. To prove you are a real human on Tinder, you will soon have the option to get your eyes scanned by a physical orb device.

What is World ID and how does Tinder's human verification work?

Read more
I didn’t expect food reels to help my diet – but they might
Scroll now, snack less later
Representative Image

A new study led by researchers at the University of Bristol has found that people trying to resist food cravings may be using social media content featuring indulgent meals as a substitute for actually eating them. The findings challenge the long-held assumption that exposure to tempting food imagery leads to overeating.

The research, conducted in collaboration with the University at Buffalo School of Management, explored how visual engagement with food content influences eating behaviour. Across three experiments involving 840 participants aged between 19 and 77, researchers combined online surveys with a controlled laboratory study to examine how people respond to food-related media.

Read more