Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Tablets
  3. Computing
  4. Legacy Archives

Apple plans to phase out use of conflict minerals

Add as a preferred source on Google

Apple’s Supplier Responsibility Progress Report for 2014 is out and available to read on its official website, and one of the biggest headlines to take away from the publication is the company’s continuing commitment to phasing out the use of conflict minerals.

The term refers to mining operations that finance armed groups and human rights violations, and while no deadline has been set by Apple, the Guardian understands that the company hopes to have its supply chain cleaned up by the end of 2014. Apple has confirmed that its sources of the rare metal tantalum are now all conflict-free, and it hopes to be able to say the same about its tin, tungsten and gold in the months and years to come.

Recommended Videos

It’s not a straightforward process however, as Senior Vice-President of Operations Jeff Williams told the Financial Times: “The fastest way for Apple to become conflict-free would be to channel our demand through a couple of verified smelters. But quite honestly, if we did that, we could wave our conflict-free flag but it would do nothing to affect the workers on the ground. And so what we are focused on is getting a critical mass of suppliers verified such that we can truly influence the demand situation and change things.”

The 2014 Supplier Responsibility Progress Report also shows a drop in the number of cases of underage child labour that Apple identified (11 active cases as opposed to 106), while more than 97 percent of the logged working weeks at Apple’s suppliers met the minimum requirement of at least one day off in every seven.

The scope of the report has been widened this year to take in a broader range of environmental considerations, including waste disposal and responsible water usage. During 2013, an additional 1.5 million workers at Apple’s suppliers received free training on their rights.

David Nield
Former Contributor
Dave is a freelance journalist from Manchester in the north-west of England. He's been writing about technology since the…
A top Kindle rival is getting jazzy with the looks and you’ll probably want this e-reader
Minimalism is out, personality is in.
Onyx Poke 7 Boox Colours

Amazon’s Kindle lineup may dominate the e-reader market, but Onyx Boox clearly wants to be the cool kid in the room. And with the upcoming Poke 7 series, it is leaning hard into style. Because honestly, these new e-readers look way more fun than most gadgets in this category have any right to.

What's new with the Onyx Boox Poke 7 series?

Read more
I gave up physical books and my reading life has never been better
Physical books are great, but e-readers are just better. There, I said it.
supernote and book in hand

If you are a book purist, you might scoff when I recommend an e-reader instead of buying physical books, and I won't blame you. The allure of the smell of pages, the weight of the book in my hands, the whole ritual, is hard to resist. 

However, if you allow me some leeway to convince you, there’s a strong argument to be made against physical books and in favor of using e-readers. So let me make the case for e-readers, because once you understand what you've been missing, it's hard to go back.

Read more
This elusive Android tablet is the world’s thinnest and makes the iPad Pro look boring
If you thought thin tablets were Apple's thing, Huawei is here to change your mind.
Huawei MatePad Pro Max

Huawei just launched the MatePad Pro Max, and it's a lot to take in. At just 4.7mm thick and weighing 499 grams, it officially takes the crown as the world's thinnest tablet. For context, the iPad Pro, which we all fawned over for being impossibly slim, is 5.1mm thick. The MatePad Pro Max beats it.

Now, there's a decent chance you'll never actually buy this tablet. Huawei devices aren't sold in every market, and the lack of Google apps is a real barrier for most users. But there's no denying that Huawei is doing things that even Apple can’t match. 

Read more