Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Business
  4. News

Ashley Madison agrees to $17.5 million fine, will pay $1.6 million for now

Add as a preferred source on Google

There are a number of ways that hackers can impact an individual or an organization. They can steal personal and private information and use it for identity theft and they can run ransomware that holds data hostage unless a ransom is paid. The impact on individuals and businesses can be devastating.

Another impact of attacks and data breaches can be legal and regulatory, namely when an organization is found guilty of negligence in protecting user information. That is exactly what occurred with the Ashley Madison data breach, where the records of 36 million users were leaked — the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has agreed to a $17.5 million settlement with the site’s operators, Ars Technica reports.

Recommended Videos

Ashley Madison is a site aimed at matching individuals who are looking for discrete relationships. The very nature of the site means members do not want their information shared and the August 2015 hack was particularly egregious for those whose identities were revealed. The hackers let loose usernames, full names, passwords, and some other identifying information such as addresses and credit card information.

It wasn’t just the leaked information that caused the FTC to impose the fine. In addition, Ashley Madison was found to have failed to follow up on the terms of a $20 “Full Delete” fee whereby user information was supposed to be purged and was not. In addition, the site operators were dinged for creating fake “female” user accounts to attract new members.

While the total settlement is $17.5 million, the FTC agreed to allow Ashley Madison’s operators to pay only $1.6 million after considering what they could actually afford to hand over. There is an “avalanche clause,” however, that remains in effect and whereby the entire $17.5 million will become due if the operators are found to be able to pay more. They will also be required under the terms of the FTC’s ruling to implement new data security protocols and to submit to third-party auditing to ensure that user data is being protected.

The FTC cannot easily determine how much to fine sites like Ashley Madison because it is difficult to determine monetary damages based on the harm caused by such data breaches. In this case, the FTC also cannot return the $20 fee customers paid to have their data deleted. In the end, the most that members can hope for is that the fine was sufficient to compel the site’s operators to lock things down more tightly.

Mark Coppock
Former Computing Writer
Mark Coppock is a Freelance Writer at Digital Trends covering primarily laptop and other computing technologies. He has…
Bombshell OpenAI lawsuit claims your ChatGPT convos were shared with Google and Meta
A class action says OpenAI let Google and Meta trackers collect sensitive user data
OpenAI Sam Altman and LoveFrom Jony Ive with Laurene Powell Jobs

A new ChatGPT privacy lawsuit claims OpenAI shared user prompts and identifying information with Google and Meta tracking tools without proper consent.

The class action filed in California, according to Futurism, says data tied to ChatGPT users, including chat queries, emails, and user IDs, moved through tools such as Meta Pixel and Google Analytics. The case alleges that violated California privacy law and federal wiretap rules.

Read more
Dell expands AI PC lineup with new slim Dell 14s and 16s laptops
Your next Dell laptop could last all day without charging
Dell 16s AI PCs

Dell has introduced the new Dell 14S and Dell 16S laptops, expanding its AI-focused Copilot+ PC lineup with slimmer designs, updated Intel processors, and improved battery life. The company is positioning both laptops as premium productivity machines that combine AI features, portability, and multimedia capabilities in a thinner form factor.

The new laptops are powered by Intel Core Ultra Series 3 processors, going up to the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H chipset. Dell says both systems include on-device AI acceleration with up to 50 TOPS NPU performance, allowing AI-related tasks to run locally without relying entirely on cloud processing. AMD Ryzen AI 400 Series variants are also expected to arrive later this month.

Read more
Intel has already started making chips for Apple, it seems, but not the most advanced kind
Intel Core Ultra Desktop CPU

The Apple-Intel chip deal that everyone said would never happen is apparently happening. And with some important caveats that the breathless headlines have largely glossed over.

Ming Chi Kuo suggests Apple has kicked off production of processors for lower-end iPhones, iPads, and Macs at Intel, running on its 18A-P process node with Foveros packaging. These are not the A-series chips powering the iPhone Pro or the M-series silicon inside a MacBook Pro. This is the legacy and mid-range stuff — the workhorses that ship in enormous volume but carry less prestige. The order mix is roughly 80% iPhone, which closely matches Apple's device sales breakdown. That detail matters more than it might first appear.

Read more