Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Being rude to ChatGPT gets more accurate answers than politeness, finds research

"You poor creature, do you even know how to solve this?"

Add as a preferred source on Google
Chatbot on a smartphone.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends

The ethics of talking to an AI chatbot, and what kind of information they can return in return, is a topic of hot debate. The risks of misleading medical information, incitement to violent actions, and detachment from real-world experiences stir intense conversations. But it seems the language you use while talking with AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini also affects the quality of answers you get. As per fresh research, being rude could be more useful than acting polite. 

The big picture

As per a pre-print research paper by experts at the Pennsylvania State University, when ChatGPT was asked the same question in different tones, rude queries “consistently outperformed” polite questions. The accuracy of the answers provided by ChatGPT with polite questions was 80.8%, while the same query described very rudely enhanced the accuracy of answers to 84.8% in a multiple-choice quiz format. 

The team defined the tone of questions across five levels, going from Very Polite and Polite to Rude and Very Rude, with Neutral sitting in the middle. “Neutral prompts are prompts without polite wordings like please, and imperious and disparaging imperatives like You idiot, figure this out,” the team describes in the research paper. 

Recommended Videos

Gentlemen, let’s maintain our good manners, regardless!

In their analysis, the team didn’t go all-explicit, but instead relied on rude questions that were somewhere along the lines of “You poor creature, do you even know how to solve this?” The image above describes the average accuracy of the ChatGPT results based on how the tone of the question went from very courteous to crude. 

Another paper shows with LLMs, friendly tone consistently underperformed in multi‑turn accuracy, while default and adversarial tones held up better.

The paper tests 3 role-play tones on the same model, default, friendly, and adversarial, then tracks accuracy over 8 follow-ups.… https://t.co/ZB6Li3eOTr pic.twitter.com/Y5Zs5xqeLq

— Rohan Paul (@rohanpaul_ai) October 11, 2025

Is my AI chatbot feeling emotions? 

The findings of the latest research, titled “Mind your tone,” contradict the findings of another paper that was published over a year ago. It analyzed half a dozen chatbots across multiple languages, and reported that rudeness deteriorates the quality of responses and injects bias, mistakes, or omits useful information in the answers provided by an AI chatbot. 

  • It is, however, worth keeping in mind that the experts behind the latest research only tested ChatGPT against a very specific kind of task, which entailed 250 variations of 50 multiple-choice questions.
  • You may not get the same kind of results with other chatbots such as Gemini, Claude, or Meta AI. Additionally, the tests were conducted on OpenAI’s GPT-4o reasoning models, while the latest version of ChatGPT that is out in the public is built atop the new GPT-5 model.
  • It is also worth noting that the spectrum of “rudeness” and “politeness” has a wide spectrum, and the quality of responses will vary based on the words and language of a user.

The bigger question is just how much the “emotional payload of the phrase” affects the responses generated by an AI chatbot, and whether any broad generalizations about their behavior can be made. It’s also pretty interesting to note that large language models (LLMs) should ideally focus on the reward and accuracy when it comes to solving a problem, instead of being affected by the emotions in the query. 

Nadeem Sarwar
Nadeem is the Managing Editor at Digital Trends.
YouTube’s AI content labels are getting a much-needed makeover
No more hunting through descriptions. YouTube's AI labels are finally moving front and center.
YouTube ai declaration longform video

This year’s Google I/O marked the transition of Google from a search company to a fully AI-focused company. The company launched several AI tools, but the one that matters the most for YouTubers is Google Omni, built for video generation and editing. 

While tools like Omni lower the barrier for creators, which is a good thing, it also results in the platform being inundated with low-effort AI content. The company understands that this will annoy a large percentage of its users, so it has been asking creators to disclose AI-generated content since 2024. 

Read more
AI models have a religion favoritism problem, and new research exposes it
AI models are subtly steering users toward certain religions, and most people have no idea it's happening.
Artificial Intelligence

A new research consortium has found something worth paying attention to: when you ask AI about grief, love, loss, or moral decisions, it almost never brings religion into the conversation.

The Consortium for Evaluation of Faith and Ethics in AI (CEFE-AI), a collaboration among researchers at Brigham Young University, Baylor University, the University of Notre Dame, and Yeshiva University, published its findings this week at the Summit on AI Ethics in Athens, Greece.

Read more
iOS 26.6 alerts you upon running out of blocked contacts limit, and that’s a problem
iOS 26.6's only known new feature is a better error message for a problem Apple, carriers, and regulators have all declined to actually fix.
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

Today, Apple seeded the first beta of iOS 26.6 to developers, and so far, it contains exactly one known feature. It’s an alert that tells you when you've run out of space on your blocked contacts list. That's right, and that’s it.  

The fact that Apple had to ship this new alert at all says something uncomfortable about how the company has handled the spam call problem, along with carriers and regulators. 

Read more