Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Apple
  4. News

Mavericks and Mountain Lion got updates from Apple, but Snow Leopard got the cold shoulder

Add as a preferred source on Google

Apple recently released an update that plugs a significant security hole that applies to both Mac OS X Mountain Lion and OS X Mavericks, the latter being the latest release in Cupertino’s long-running line of OS X-branded operating systems. But the company failed to provide a similar update compatible with OS X Snow Leopard, which was released over four years ago back in 2009.

With that in mind, it looks as if Apple has decided to discontinue supporting Snow Leopard for good, despite the fact that roughly 19 percent of all Macs run the operating system. However,  this is only a theory based on observations considering that, unlike Microsoft, Apple doesn’t maintain a page that details when support and updates for each of its operating systems will end. Redmond calls it its “Windows lifecycle fact sheet.” For what it’s worth, the last security update that Apple released for Snow Leopard was in September of 2013.

Recommended Videos

Speaking of Microsoft, the 2001 released Windows XP, which makes OS X Snow Leopard look new and shiny by comparison, is about to go through a similar experience, assuming that Apple has indeed ended Snow Leopard support for good. Microsoft will end support for Windows XP on April 8. This poses a substantial security risk for those still using the OS, especially considering that millions of people refuse to budge and won’t upgrade to Windows 7 and Windows 8. As of January, Windows XP’s desktop OS marketshare stands at 29.3 percent.

If Snow Leopard support has indeed ended for good, and it appears that Apple has decided to pull the plug, it’ll be interesting to see what the usage states will be for both Snow Leopard and Windows XP several months from now.

What do you think? Sound off in the comments below.

Image credit: http://4.bp.blogspot.com

Konrad Krawczyk
Former Computing Editor
Konrad covers desktops, laptops, tablets, sports tech and subjects in between for Digital Trends. Prior to joining DT, he…
Don’t hold your breath for Meta’s Muse Spark AI to pop up in your phone apps anytime soon
iPhone showing Meta AI Support Assistant

Meta’s next big AI model may not be arriving as quickly as the company originally hoped. According to a report from The Wall Street Journal, Meta has repeatedly delayed the release of its upcoming flagship AI model, internally known as “Muse Spark,” raising fresh questions about the company’s AI ambitions and readiness.

The delays reportedly stem from concerns around performance, reliability, and internal disagreements over whether the model is competitive enough against rapidly advancing rivals like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic.

Read more
Google wants your app code so badly, it’s willing to pay for it
Google is paying for app code, and the reason is exactly what you think.
Google Logo

Google has been quietly reaching out to Android developers with an offer to buy access to their code. As reported by 404 Media, the company sent emails to a select group of Google Play developers, inviting them to join what it calls a "confidential content offer pilot." 

The email frames it as a revenue opportunity, saying developers can "get paid for sharing the code powering your apps, as well as your archived projects." Google adds that developers retain their intellectual property rights and that the license is non-exclusive.

Read more
Nvidia confirms more RTX Spark processors are coming with N2X and N3 series lined up
Huang confirming a multi-generation roadmap before the first device has even shipped is the clearest signal yet that this is a decade-long commitment.
nvidia-rtx-spark

The PC and laptop industry has run on Intel and AMD silicon so long that most people don’t even question whether these are the only options. 

Nvidia just answered that question at Computex 2026, in the form of the RTX Spark superchip, and Jensen Huang’s comments about what comes next suggest that it wasn’t a one-time experiment. 

Read more