Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Why Apple’s M3 Ultra could be an absolute monster

Add as a preferred source on Google
Apple Mac Studio top down angled view showing side and rear.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

There’s one M3 chip left to complete the rollout of Apple’s latest line of Mac chips — the M3 Ultra. It’ll likely get announced at Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC), but some new rumors are pointing to a very different chip than the M2 Ultra or M1 Ultra.

A new post on X from Apple commentator and YouTuber Vadim Yuryev indicates that the M3 Ultra will be designed as a completely standalone chip, rather than two M3 Max chips stitched together.

Recommended Videos

Apple's in the process of restructuring their Apple Silicon lineup. M3 Max no longer comes with the UltraFusion interconnect (see image)

This means that the M3 Ultra chip will be redesigned as its own standalone chip, no longer being made up of 2x Max dies.

What this means:

1.… pic.twitter.com/o4J2hpEGaI

— Vadim Yuryev (@VadimYuryev) March 27, 2024

The idea isn’t based on insider information, but is instead an extrapolation from the design of the M3 Max, which is featured in the MacBook Pro. Apple has never officially commented on the design, but based on a photo posted by Wccftech, the current M3 Max doesn’t appear to use UltraFusion interconnect. That’s a big deal on its own.

The effect on the forthcoming M3 Ultra, though, is where things get even more interesting. According to Vadim’s hypothesis, this will allow the M3 Ultra to be a more proper desktop chip. For example, the M3 Ultra might not need Efficiency cores and could perhaps have more Performance and GPU cores give that it’s no longer being restricted by the M3 Max. The end result would be better performance scaling up from the base M3 than in previous generations.

But wait, it doesn’t stop there.

Vadim extrapolates further, suggesting that an even larger M3 Extreme chip is in the works, which would be made out of two M3 Ultra dies. This, in theory, would be a much more efficient way to scale up performance than stitching four M3 Max chips together. Vadim notes that this would allow Apple to connect larger amounts of memory and scale up the integrated GPU to be “neck and neck with Nvidia’ flagship desktop GPUs.” That’s quite a claim.

If this chip really came out, I would presume that it would be reserved solely for the Mac Pro. Right now, the Mac Studio and Mac Pro use the same chips, which is unfortunate.

This isn’t the first time we’ve heard of the “Extreme” chip, of course. The M2 Extreme had been rumored in 2022, but the chip was reportedly canceled.

A close-up of Apple's Mac Pro from 2019 showing the front "cheesegrater" grill and top handle.
Digital Trends

Vadim admits that the debut of the first Extreme chip could end up skipping another generation and not coming out until the M4 line is launched.

The latest reports indicate that the M4 chip may not launch until early 2025, leaving the rest of this year relatively empty for Mac releases. It certainly seems possible that Apple could launch the M3 Ultra at WWDC and the M3 Extreme this fall on an updated Mac Pro. Then again, it seems as if Apple will be far more concentrated on AI at WWDC this year, so we’ll have to see if it has room in its announcements for a relatively niche, high-end desktop chip.

That, of course, is all baseless speculation as of now.

But Vadim’s analysis is certainly intriguing and makes sense based on the design of the M3 Max. We’ll have to wait and see to confirm these assumptions about the M3 Ultra.

Luke Larsen
Former Senior Editor, Computing
Luke Larsen is the Senior Editor of Computing, managing all content covering laptops, monitors, PC hardware, Macs, and more.
I built a Mac app to track my bad posture with AirPods. I didn’t write a line of code.
A one-shot attempt with Claude that ran in the first attempt. It almost felt like witnessing magic.
Person wearing AirPods Pro.

A few weeks ago, I wrote about an app that looks at you through the Mac’s webcam, and as soon as it detects a slouching posture, it sends a notification. The app even logs all the instances and provides a daily posture score. It was an open-source app, but soon after it was shared on Reddit by the creator, a huge chunk of fellow Reddit lurkers started asking about how it processes and stores data. Those were existentially valid queries.

After all, you are giving an app access to the camera, which can monitor you and the world around you in real-time. Is there a backdoor that allows a bad actor to take a sneak peek? What else is the app logging in the background, and how much of the audio-visual stream is being relayed or stored on an external cloud server? Thankfully, the app works fully online, and all the processing happens locally on my Mac. But the sense of unease prevailed.

Read more
Fitbit is becoming Google Health, and it’s getting a bunch of wellness upgrades
Google is finally treating health tracking as a platform play, pulling in medical records, third-party fitness data, and AI coaching in a way that Fitbit's standalone app was never built to handle.
New Google Health app.

Google is officially pulling the plug on the Fitbit app, replacing it with the new Google Health app on May 19, 2026. It is quite ironic, as the company just announced a new Fitbit Air screenless fitness tracker, but the change will take place via an OTA update. 

This is happening after Fitbit’s fifteen-year run, wherein it gathered millions of fitness-focused users and provided them with various health trackers and meaningful insights via its software. 

Read more
Your coworker’s AI-built app might be leaking company secrets
Thousands of AI-built apps are spilling secrets online
girl coding on computer

AI coding tools have made it ridiculously easy to build a web app, and it only takes a few minutes to set up now. This ease has lowered the barrier to app development, which is causing a new set of issues. So what happens when these AI-made apps go live without anyone checking the locks? You get secrets spilling out all over the internet.

A WIRED report highlights a major security problem around so-called “vibe-coded” apps, which are built using AI development platforms such as Lovable, Replit, Base44, and Netlify.

Read more