Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Web
  4. Legacy Archives

Google Chrome usage dips below 20 percent on desktops, while Safari, Firefox, and Internet Explorer gain

Add as a preferred source on Google

Google Chrome may be the clear number two when it comes to its presence on desktop computers, but its usage stats took a bit of a hit last month. Meanwhile, the rest of its main competitors all gained users, according to Net Marketshare.

In August, Google Chrome’s market share fell from 20.37 percent July, to 19.61 percent. Meanwhile, Internet Explorer, which by far is the most popular desktop Web browser, raised its share from 58.01 percent in July, to 58.46 last month.

Recommended Videos

Related: Here is everything you need to know about Windows 9

Mozilla Firefox also gained some fans on the desktop front, though its uptick in popularity was much smaller than the one IE enjoyed in August. Its share rose from 15.08 percent in July, to 15.23 percent last month. The same can be said for Safari, which saw its share rise from 5.16 percent in July, to 5.32 in August.

Of the desktop browsers that gained users in August, Internet Explorer experienced the biggest spike; 0.45 percent. Firefox enjoyed the smallest bump of the three, rising by 0.15 percent.

Related: Windows XP end of support survival guide

It’s worth noting that both Safari and Internet Explorer have one clear advantage over Firefox when it comes to gaining fans. Both Apple and Microsoft make popular operating systems which include each company’s respective browsers as their defaults. Firefox does not enjoy that perk.

For what it’s worth, Chrome’s usage dip in the desktop computer world could be due to a battery life-killing bug in Chrome that came to light earlier this summer. The bug is specific to Windows-based devices, and Google is already working on a fix for this issue.

Konrad Krawczyk
Former Computing Editor
Konrad covers desktops, laptops, tablets, sports tech and subjects in between for Digital Trends. Prior to joining DT, he…
Asus puts the outrageous dual-screen ROG Zephyrus Duo on the shelf at an eye-watering price
The ROG Zephyrus Duo isn't just a gaming laptop with two screens, it's the company’s most serious attempt yet to add more ambition to a "portable workstation" that’s capable of gaming.
Asus dual-screen laptop America.

Asus has decided that one screen isn’t simply enough on a laptop. The ROG Zephyrus Duo has returned to the market with two screens, with pre-orders now live for what the company is calling the world’s first 16-inch dual-screen gaming laptop.

Starting at $4,499.99 and going up to $5,499.99 for the top configuration, this is undoubtedly a machine that is built for people measuring their laptops with ambition, either for innovation or the desire to game on a dual-screen laptop. 

Read more
Nvidia quietly released a new version of GeForce RTX 5070 GPU inside a driver blog post
And more VRAM doesn't always mean more performance, and the pricing could make the RTX 5070 Ti a better value depending on final configurations.
The RTX 5070 in a graphic.

Nvidia just announced a new GPU variant in the weirdest way possible: buried it in a game driver update blog post. 

Alongside the release of its Game Ready 596.36 WHQL driver, the company also confirmed the launch of a 12GB GDDR7 configuration of the GeForce RTX 5070 laptop GPU. 

Read more
Dell 34 Plus USB-C monitor review: An ultrawide beauty with surprises you’ll love
Dell's curved monitor blends practical minimalism with a few neat perks of its own.
Dell 34 Plus USB-C Monitor - S3425DW

Quick Take

I’ve grown deeply suspicious of any monitor that calls itself a “productivity display.” They're not bad, per se. The real reason is that most of them are boring, and sluggish at adopting modern standards. Chunky black bezels, boring grey-on-grey corporate look that screams “I belong in a 2014 cubicle,” and a dull desk presence. I’ve never wanted any of them sitting on my workstation. So when I unboxed the Dell 34 Plus USB-C monitor (SKU is S3425DW), I was bracing for the usual disappointment. It was in for a surprise.

Read more