Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Razer Blade vs. MacBook Air 13-inch (2013): Spec showdown

Add as a preferred source on Google

Razer-Pro-vs-MacBook-AirIf the name Razer doesn’t sound familiar, it’s because it isn’t – yet. The company’s been gaining ground as of late thanks to its latest Blade laptop that claims to be thinner than a MacBook Air. With big names like Microsoft, Acer, HP, and Apple, already an established force in the PC market, you’d have to be a pretty ambitious to believe you could just jump in and secure your own chunk of the computing pie.

Based on the fact that it tossed its original Blade creation into the market without any apprehension, Razer obviously doesn’t care about stereotypes and general guidelines – it even touted it as the ‘world’s first true gaming laptop. The original Blade must’ve been successful enough to warrant two new versions this year, a 14-inch Blade and 17-inch Blade Pro. We reviewed the 14-inch Blade and loved it. 

Recommended Videos

And if we didn’t view the Razer Blade as purely a gaming laptop, and stacked it alongside comparable notebooks, you would notice that it strikes a pretty close resemblance to the Apple MacBook Air. In fact, DT’s Matt Smith called the Blade an “emo Macbook that decided to become a roadie rather than get a real job.” Its black color is a night and day difference when stacked up against the MacBook Air, but both of these devices actually share a number of features. They both showcase flat un-textured surfaces, a uni-body metal chassis, and they both attach their display’s by way of a single, wide hinge.

But do the similarities continue beyond the design of these products and into their hardware substance? Let’s take a look.  

 

Razer Blade 14-inch

Razer-Blade-press-image
Image used with permission by copyright holder

MacBook Air 13-inch (2013)

macbook-air-13-3-display-2
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Dimensions 13.6″ x 9.3″ x 0.66″ 12.8″ x 8.94″ x 0.11″ – 0.68”
Weight 4.1 lbs 2.96 lbs
Keyboard Chiclet, backlit Chiclet, backlit
Processor 4th-Gen Intel Core i7 4702HQ 2.2GHz 4th-Gen Intel Ivy Bridge Core i5 1.3GHz
RAM 8GB 4GB
Graphics Integrated Nvidia GeForce 765M  Integrated Intel HD 5000
Screen Size 14-inch 13-inch
Resolution 1600 x 900 HD+ 1440 x 900 LCD
Storage 128GB SSD 128GB SSD
Networking Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0 Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0
Ports HDMI, 3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 2.0 Thunderbolt, 2 USB 3.0, SD card reader
Webcam HD Webcam HD Webcam
Operating System Windows 8 (64 Bit) Mac OS X Mountain Lion 
Battery Life 6 hours Up to 12 hours
Price $1,800 $1,100

As you can see, both base models come with a 128GB solid-state drive and both have Wi-fi, Bluetooth 4.0, USB 3.0 ports (though the Razer has one more than the Air), and an HD webcam. That’s where the similarities end though, and we get a picture of what separates these two devices from one another.

The Razer Blade has a solid 4GB of memory over the MacBook Air and features one of Intel’s newest Haswell processors. The other standout difference pertains to graphics. The MacBook Air 2013 Edition features integrated Intel HD 5000 graphics, which are decent, but do not provide the same capabilities as the Razer Blade’s Nvidia GeForce 765M GPU. Granted, we’re comparing a notebook that was tailor-made for gaming with an Apple device that was created for the general computing public. The Razer Blade has a couple more USB ports than the MacBook Air 2013, and it does feature an HDMI slot, but does not have a card reader.

The MacBook Air went through a pretty decent upgrade, with the main change focusing on battery life. Apple managed to craft a slim notebook that lasts approximately 12 hours on a single charge. Razer told us the battery life on the Blade is about six hours – half of what the Air offers.

And though there are some similarities, these two products are geared towards two different types of people. One is ported for gamers, and the other was designed for more general practices, yet, they still manage to match up fairly close to each other in both design and hardware specs. The Blade, of course, has a better video card and more RAM, as it should (to play games). The only other difference these devices share (and it’s a massive one) is price point.

Currently, Apple’s updated MacBook Air 2013 slides in at a price point of $1,100, which puts it in a pretty affordable position. The Razer Blade, however, starts off at $1,800. Although, if you’re a true gamer, you may end up tossing even more cash at Razer to upgrade the storage capacity from 128GB to 256GB.

Russ Boswell
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Russ Boswell is an aspiring video game and technology journalist from Colorado. He's been an avid gamer since he was old…
Microsoft Edge is about to get more frequent updates, but don’t expect more features
Starting with Edge 152 on August 27, Microsoft is cutting its release cycle in half, with smaller but more frequent updates for Stable channel users.
Microsoft Edge illustration official

Microsoft is accelerating updates to its Edge browser, switching from a monthly release schedule to a biweekly one. The change takes effect with Edge 152, due on August 27, and puts the browser on the same cadence as Google Chrome.

More updates, not more features

Read more
What makes a laptop good for both work and entertainment?
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

This post is brought to you in paid partnership with HP.

The HP OmniBook X Flip is designed as an all‑day AI PC that adapts seamlessly from productivity to entertainment without switching devices.

Read more
Your Windows 11 PC can now natively run AI workloads, even if it lacks the Copilot+ badge
Windows 11 laptop on a table

For the better part of a year, Microsoft has been telling us that the future of AI on Windows belongs to Copilot+ PCs. If you wanted Microsoft’s most advanced local AI features, you needed a machine with a dedicated Neural Processing Unit (NPU). That was the deal. Now, Microsoft appears to be rewriting the rules.

According to updated documentation, Windows 11’s local Language Model APIs can now run on non-Copilot+ PCs, provided they have an Nvidia GeForce RTX 30-series GPU (or newer) with at least 6GB of VRAM. On the surface, this sounds like a developer-focused update. In reality, it could be one of the most significant shifts in Microsoft’s AI PC strategy since Copilot+ PCs launched last year. More importantly, it raises a question that has been lingering ever since the AI PC era began: Did we really need NPUs for all of this in the first place?

Read more