Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

A Musk-backed group just offered a $97 billion unsolicited bid for OpenAI

Add as a preferred source on Google
Sam Altman at The Age of AI Panel, Berlin.
Technische Universität Berlin

In what is becoming an increasingly tiresome and petty personal spat between a pair of tech billionaires, the Wall Street Journal reports Monday that a consortium backed by xAI CEO Elon Musk has made an unsolicited, $97.4 billion bid for control over rival OpenAI. This offer comes mere months after Musk sued the company over its plan to transition to a for-profit business structure.

“It’s time for OpenAI to return to the open-source, safety-focused force for good it once was,” the WSJ cited Musk as saying in a statement provided by his lawyer, Marc Toberoff, to the OpenAI board. “We will make sure that happens.”

Recommended Videos

The WSJ reports that the bid is being backed by xAI, which would likely merge with OpenAI, should the deal eventually go through. The board has not made any decisions about the offer as of yet, but OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has publicly rejected Musk’s overtures, offering to instead purchase Twitter (now, officially, X “The Everything App”) for the same amount.

no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want

— Sam Altman (@sama) February 10, 2025

Musk and Altman have been at this for years now. The two co-founded OpenAI in 2015, though Musk resigned from his position as co-chair of the company’s board in 2018 after his demands for “majority equity, absolute control, and to be CEO,” were rejected. He went on to found xAI in 2023 — purveyors of the Grok chatbot — and has since committed to relentlessly harassing OpenAI, and Sam Altman in particular.

In March 2023, half a year before founding xAI, Musk cosigned an open letter calling for “all AI labs to immediately pause for at least 6 months the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4.” It is surely only a coincidence that xAI itself publicly launched almost exactly six months after that letter was published.

In November of that year, shortly after Altman had been (temporarily) rousted from his leadership position at OpenAI, Musk shared an unsigned and anonymous letter that he “received” that accused Altman of numerous unethical dealings as CEO. The source of those accusations were eventually tracked to unverified posts made to Board.com, an anonymous message board site.

Musk has sued OpenAI multiple times in 2024 alone. In March, he sued the company along with Altman and the company’s President, Greg Brockman, over allegations that they had violated the company’s founding contract in their pursuit of commercial interests at the expense of the public good, though he subsequently withdrew the suit the day before a judge was scheduled to hand down their ruling on whether it could proceed or would be dismissed.

He revived that lawsuit in August with the same claims as before. “Never before has a corporation gone from tax-exempt charity to a $157 billion for-profit, market-paralyzing gorgon — and in just eight years,” the complaint reads. “​​After Musk lent his name to the venture, invested significant time, tens of millions of dollars in seed capital and recruited top AI scientists for OpenAI Inc, Musk and the non-profit’s namesake objective were betrayed by Altman and his accomplices.”

In November, Musk abruptly amended the suit, expanding it to target OpenAI-backer, Microsoft, while naming Shivon Zilis, mother of three of Musk’s children, as a plaintiff. OpenAI responded in December with a blog post titled, “Elon Musk wanted an OpenAI for-profit,” detailing Musk’s initial support for the for-profit transition and provided email records to back up those assertions. The courts have not yet ruled on the ongoing lawsuit, but given that the running feud between the two men now stretches more than six years, there’s little hope that this latest salvo will be the last of their fight.

Andrew Tarantola
Former Computing Writer
Andrew Tarantola is a journalist with more than a decade reporting on emerging technologies ranging from robotics and machine…
AI bots are a hit across the hotel biz, and if they feel creepy, you’re not alone: Study
Hotel booking chatbots are creeping out customers, but there's a simple fix that can make a difference.
Isometric Ai assistant and bubble speech, 3D illustration

If you have ever tried to book a hotel online and found yourself unsettled by the AI chatbot trying to help you, science has your back. New study from Texas A&M College of Agriculture and Life Sciences confirms that hotel booking chatbots are genuinely creeping people out, and it is actually hurting bookings.

What is giving hotel chatbots their creep factor?

Read more
Pope says AI must be disarmed and shouldn’t dominate humanity. We’re going the opposite way.
The Pope just dropped his first encyclical, and AI companies should probably read it.
Pope Leo XIV signing his first encyclical

Pope Leo XIV signed his first encyclical on May 15, the 135th anniversary of Pope Leo XIII's Rerum novarum. The document, Magnifica humanitas, was published on May 25 and addresses one of the defining challenges of our time: artificial intelligence and its impact on humanity.

The core message isn't anti-technology. The Pope is clear that technology is neither a threat nor inherently evil. However, he does say that technology is never neutral, because it takes on the values of those who build, fund, and control it. That's where things get interesting.

Read more
I built an offline Grammarly alternative and turned it into a Mac app without any coding
It lives in a browser tab. It's a Chrome extension. It's also a Mac app. Claude built it for me in all three flavors.
Grammarly alternative built using Claude.

I wrote this entire article while seated on an airplane experiencing unusually high turbulence. The software I used to spell-check and grammatically sanitize the draft was built at an airport. The language engine is running entirely on my Mac, fully offline, fixing all my typos and removing the double spaces while I mash the keyboard and sip a sugar-bomb coffee. 

Also, I don't know how to code. I didn't write a single line of code, and yet, the Mac software I am using right now looks classier and feels snappier than Grammarly ever did. Grammarly, if you don't know, is one of the most popular apps for spelling and grammar checking on the planet. So, how did I do it? I asked Claude. I narrated my wish, it asked my preferences, and in less than 30 minutes, I built myself a no-internet Grammarly replacement while also avoiding the "yet-another-subscription" curse.

Read more