Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Features

Need to get ‘better’ at AI? The world’s top universities are gifting you their best classes

Add as a preferred source on Google
Asus Vivobook 14
Asus

If the onset of AI is a worry for you, then ask yourself a simple question: ‘Do I actually know how it works?’

If the answer is ‘no’, ‘sort of’ or ‘I can ask ChatGPT how to convert recipes’ then you could probably do with some help.

Well, we’ve got great news: some of the world’s top universities are offering you their best courseware about artificial intelligence for free. Think about that. The best thinking of elite universities for free, meaning you’ll understand the advent of Gemini or Perplexity in no time.

Recommended Videos

Whether you want to just get grounded in artificial intelligence, apply it to your business or school, or start coding in Python there is a class for you.  (And, yes, I asked OpenAI’s GPT-5 to help me compile this list.)

Quick picks by level 

  • Just starting out: MIT AI 101, then Harvard CS50 AI.   
  • Comfortable with Python + basic ML math: CMU 10-601 or Berkeley CS189.   
  • Targeting LLMs/NLP in depth: Stanford CS224N.   

MIT — AI 101 (OCW) — True Beginner 

Short, workshop-style starter that demystifies key terms and includes an interactive exercise. Ideal if you’re starting from zero before jumping into CS50 AI. It’s a few years old but helps explain the fundamentals.

Format: brief videos, slides, hands-on demo.   

Harvard — CS50’s Introduction to AI with Python (edX) — Beginner→Intermediate 

  • Still one of the most accessible on-ramps to “classical” AI plus modern ML. It’s self-paced, free to audit, and actively available through December 31, 2025.

    This remains a community favorite in 2025: “Best of all time” lists and 5-star user ratings on Class Central; Reddit threads praise the clarity but note you should be ready for non-trivial Python projects.   

    Level-wise, you’ll want basic Python; the math is explained gently.

    Format: polished video lectures, problem sets/projects, transcripts, and auto-grading via edX.

IIT Madras (India) — SWAYAM-Plus AI Series, 2025 — Beginner 

  • Free, English-language intros spanning AI in Python and domainspecific applications; designed to require only basic digital literacy. Good for absolute beginners wanting structured, practical modules.

    Format: videos, exercises; optional low-cost certificate.   

Carnegie Mellon — Introduction to Machine Learning (10-301/10-601), Spring 2025 — Intermediate 

  • CMU’s 2025 offering hosts a detailed public syllabus; while graded resources sit behind campus tools, you can follow lecture topics and posted notes/links. Great if you want a classic ML theory+practice path (supervised/unsupervised, evaluation, etc.).

    Format: public schedule/notes; some lecture material varies in openness by week.   

UC Berkeley — CS189: Introduction to Machine Learning, Spring 2025 — Intermediate→Advanced 

  • Berkeley’s flagship ML course publishes complete lecture notes and typically shares lecture videos each term (availability can fluctuate). It’s math-forward and an excellent bridge to deep learning.

    Format: lecture notes, (often) public videos, assignments/solutions for past terms.   

Stanford — CS224N: Natural Language Processing with Deep Learning — Intermediate→Advanced 

  • Stanford keeps publishing the course site with updated slides/notes; the 2024–25 (“win2425”) run indicates current materials. Public lecture videos are typically the 2023 playlist; slides/assignments get refreshed annually.

    It assumes solid Python, ML, and some deep-learning background. Reviews from learners consistently call it rigorous but rewarding, especially for those targeting LLMs. 

    It is routinely recommended for serious NLP/LLM study—rigorous assignments, strong research grounding; discussions highlight the workload but high payoff.   

    Format: slides, assignments, prior-year videos.

If you’re still unsure about whether you can commit the time to the world of AI, you can always start a little bit simpler. OpenAI has a 101 guide to ChatGPT, or you can quickly run through Perplexity’s beginner’s guide.

Whatever you do, if you’ve got a modicum of interest (or worry) about the world of AI, then don’t delay on learning more – the quicker you understand the way this new technology works, the sooner you’ll start feeling part of the upcoming changes, rather than being beholden by them.

Peter Horan
Peter has published a number of technology magazines and sites over the years. His current passion is around AI.
Topics
Next-gen AI breakthrough promises chatbots that can read the room better
Researchers are teaching AI chatbots to read between the lines
Generative AI

Have you ever asked a chatbot something and felt like it completely missed your point? You say something with a bit of nuance, and the AI misses the subtlety entirely. That is exactly the problem researchers are trying to solve.

Even though the emotional connection with AI can feel deeper than human conversation for many users, most AI systems today still treat a sentence as a single block of sentiment. If you mix praise and criticism, the nuance often gets lost.

Read more
ChatGPT is not getting an erotic mode, after all
OpenAI pulls back as “adult mode” runs into bigger concerns
ChatGPT-to-rollback-to-friendly-and-adulttt

If you were expecting ChatGPT to get an “erotic mode,” that idea is officially off the table. According to Financial Times, OpenAI’s spicy mode is on hold “indefinitely.”

Inside OpenAI's struggle to bring the adult mode to life

Read more
Turns out, if you ask an AI to play an expert, it gets less reliable
Asking AI to pretend it's an expert can backfire, but researchers may have found a fix.
AI

you’ve probably seen the tip floating around: tell AI to act like an expert in a field, and you’ll get better answers. It’s popular advice, and it does work, sometimes. However, a new study suggests that using AI personas may not be as effective as we thought it would be.

Researchers from the University of California tested 12 different personas across six language models. The personas ranged from math and coding experts to creative writers and safety monitors. The goal was to find out how well AI performs when it is instructed to act as an expert.

Read more