Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. News

Apple coughs up $250 million to pay iPhone users because Siri just wasn’t smart enough

Siri’s big AI glow-up is late, and it's costing Apple a lot

Add as a preferred source on Google
Siri finding flight details from email app
Siri finding flight details from email app Apple

Apple’s long-delayed Siri upgrade is no longer just an embarrassing AI setback, as the company has agreed to a very real, very hefty settlement. The company is paying $250 million to settle a class-action lawsuit alleging it misled iPhone buyers in the US about the AI-powered Siri features announced as part of Apple Intelligence.

According to the Financial Times, the case centers on Apple’s promise of a more personalized Siri that was first shown at WWDC 2024 and promoted alongside newer iPhones.

Why is Apple paying out a quarter of a billion dollars?

Apple originally pitched the new Siri as a major part of its Apple Intelligence rollout. The assistant was supposed to understand more personal context, read what was happening on a user’s device, and take actions across apps. But that version of Siri never really arrived. Apple did roll out some Apple Intelligence features over time, like writing tools, image-generation features, and a decent ChatGPT integration. Meanwhile, the more ambitious Siri overhaul, however, was delayed well beyond the iPhone 16 launch window.

The lawsuit covers US buyers of the iPhone 16 lineup and iPhone 15 Pro models. Those were the devices Apple marketed as capable of running Apple Intelligence features. Over the last couple of years, the company has been trying to convince users and investors that it can seriously compete in the AI race. But the delay was obvious, and Apple publicly acknowledged the Siri delay in March 2025. This came several months after the iPhone 16 launched.

Apple still plans on delivering it

The upgraded Siri is reportedly still on the roadmap. Apple now plans to offer the new version this year, with reports pointing to iOS 27 and a partnership with Google that would let Apple use Gemini models to help power the experience. Two years later, the feature still isn’t fully here, and Apple may be paying hundreds of millions of dollars for the gap between the demo and the delivery.

Vikhyaat Vivek
Vikhyaat Vivek is a tech journalist and reviewer with seven years of experience covering consumer hardware, with a focus on…
Infamous “Apple copycat” offers an ingenious smartphone battery upgrade that Apple must copy
Xiaomi’s battery upgrade program is exactly what old iPhones need
The Xiaomi 13 Ultra held like a camera.

Xiaomi has long been accused of taking inspiration from Apple. But this time around, the inspiration needs to move the other way. The company has expanded its paid battery upgrade program in China to cover the Xiaomi 13, Xiaomi 13 Pro, and Xiaomi 13 Ultra.

Unlike a typical battery replacement, where a company simply swaps the worn-out cells with the same capacity, Xiaomi is offering larger batteries that give older phones a boost in endurance.

Read more
Google is adopting a new framework to stop shady Android apps from raising hell
Android’s next security trick is a public record for official apps
iPhone screen showing a folder with all of the Google apps.

Android security is getting another layer of accountability, and it's aimed squarely at a problem that digital signatures can't solve. Google has announced that it is expanding Binary Transparency across the Android ecosystem. Starting with the production of Google apps for Android and Mainline modules, the company will log official releases on a public append-only ledger, which should make it easier to verify whether the software running on a device is the exact version Google intended to release.

Why digital signatures no longer cut it

Read more
I tested the Xiaomi 17 Ultra’s camera and I don’t think I’ll ever go back to an iPhone
In a "Galaxy" of slow innovation and complacency, the famed "Apple copycat" is setting a high standard for everyone.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra

When it comes to flagship phones, the word “Ultra” has started to lose meaning. Every brand throws it around, but very few actually deliver something that feels… ultra. Take the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, for instance. It’s a solid phone, sure, but exciting? Not quite. And that’s the bigger issue with the US market right now. Some of the most interesting Android flagships simply don’t make it here.

Meanwhile, brands like Vivo, Oppo, and Honor are quietly pushing smartphone cameras into territory that feels closer to dedicated cameras than ever before. And then there’s the Xiaomi 17 Ultra. After using it for a couple of weeks, one thing is clear: this isn’t just a phone with a great camera. It’s a camera that happens to be a phone. And honestly, it kind of feels like a modern-day revival of the Samsung Galaxy Camera.

Read more