After spending over $1,000 on a flagship 5G phone, you might think you’re getting the fastest network speeds possible. After all, isn’t that what you’re paying for? But our recent network testing shows that may very well not be the case, with 5G performance on flagship phones being minimally better than budget phones, and in some cases, actually worse.
To give you some context, earlier this year, we put the 5G-capable MediaTek Dimensity 700 against the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 in a test to see which processor delivered the best 5G performance and had the best daily user experience. Six months on, we’re going to take a look at four new 5G phones with different chips to see how they compare to answer this question: Does paying more for a smartphone with a flagship processor inside give you the fastest network connection, or is it all pumped-up marketing?
Understanding 5G
Before going into the details, we received some very interesting feedback from MediaTek after our last test, which is also relevant to this one. MediaTek contacted Digital Trends to discuss the 5G speed test results, as the Dimensity 700-powered Realme 8 5G couldn’t match the Oppo A54 5G with a Qualcomm chip inside. The company then took its own test equipment to the area where I had tested the phones, and in conversations afterwards, it gave plenty of insight into how 5G varies across phones, networks, and location.
In the previous test, hyperlocalization of the 5G signal meant that just a short distance away from where I tested my phones, MediaTek’s speed tests all showed almost identical results. I used the network’s coverage map to find an area with 5G, but even where it’s shown to be full strength inside and outside, results can clearly vary.
According to MediaTek, the variation in results depends on more than just location. The different modems in each phone all perform slightly differently, further affecting the results, along with other considerations like network conditions, whether the phone itself has been tested and is sold by the carrier, and even how the phone is configured to show when it genuinely has a 5G signal and uses it for download. Some phones apparently may show 5G in the status bar, but actually connect to 4G due to network conditions.
In other words, it’s very difficult to really assess 5G performance. However, this kind of test — using 5G on the phone you have in your pocket, at the time you need it — is representative of how we all use our phones in real life, and it helps us understand 5G’s current benefits, along with which processor and modem combination makes the most out of what’s available. This time, it also shows whether a more expensive phone performs better than a cheaper one.
The phones
We used two of the cheapest 5G phones available for the last test, but this time we tried four phones in all, with three falling into the mid-range and one into the high-end. We chose the Motorola Moto Edge Lite, the Oppo Find X3 Lite, the OnePlus Nord 2, and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3. While some of these may be hard to find in the U.S., the processors used can be found in a variety of smartphones available everywhere.
The Moto Edge 20 Lite has a retail price of 300 British pounds($400) and has a MediaTek Dimensity 720 processor inside. The Oppo Find X3 Lite has a retail price of 380 pounds ($505) and a Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G processor, while the 500-pound ($665) OnePlus Nord has a MediaTek Dimensity 1200 processor. Finally, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 processor and costs 1,600 pounds, or $1,800 in the U.S.
Obviously, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 isn’t likely to be a consideration for anyone seriously looking at the Motorola, Oppo, or OnePlus phones, but it’ll be interesting to see what, if any, difference there is in 5G performance out of a phone with a flagship processor and modem inside versus decidedly midrange devices. I also chose a different location this time, visiting the center of a large town right next to a train station that is shown as having a strong indoor/outdoor 5G signal by the U.K.’s EE network operator.
Finally, the test was run using two apps, Speedtest by Ookla and the Fast Speed Test.
5G and 4G test results
I ran all the tests multiple times with no other apps running, and with all phones running the latest versions of their respective software, then recorded the best performance for each phone. All are U.K. supplied review sample phones apart from the Galaxy Z Fold 3, which was purchased new directly from Samsung. The EE network sells all the devices tested except the OnePlus Nord 2, which is available unlocked through OnePlus.
Here’s what happened when connecting to the EE network in the U.K., with a full 5G signal displaying on all phones:
Oneplus Nord 2
Speedtest by Ookla: 378Mbps download/81Mbps upload
Fast Speed Test: 440Mbps
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Speedtest by Ookla: 442Mbps download/86Mbps upload
Fast Speed Test: 370Mbps
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Speedtest by Ookla: 438Mbps download/93Mbps upload
Fast Speed Test: 470Mbps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3
Speedtest by Ookla: 392Mbps download/73Mbps upload
Fast Speed Test: 140Mbps
Later, I ran the same tests in a 4G area with 75% reception showing on each phone:
OnePlus Nord 2
Speedtest by Ookla: 78Mbps download/3.8Mbps upload
Fast Speed Test: 28Mbps
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Speedtest by Ookla: 32Mbps download/2.3Mbps upload
Fast Speed Test: 37Mbps
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Speedtest by Ookla: 80Mbps download/3.1Mbps upload
Fast Speed Test: 35Mbps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3
Speedtest by Ookla: 48Mbps download/5.3Mbps upload
Fast Speed Test: 52Mbps
Big, expensive loser?
As noted, I recorded the fastest result for each series of tests, and while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 did manage a respectable speed using Ookla, most of the time, it struggled to meet 200Mbps download on 5G, and around 40Mbps download on 4G. Its speed on the Fast Speed Test app is more representative of what I usually saw using Ookla. All the other phones consistently kept around the same speeds as listed, with the variation at little more than 20Mbps.
Before starting the tests, I had expected the Z Fold 3 to be the fastest. It is, after all, by far the most expensive, costing three or four timesas much. Yet the network speeds, almost across the board, were the most disappointing. Both the OnePlus Nord 2 and the Oppo Find X3 Lite recorded faster speeds than the Z Fold 3 throughout my tests. On 4G, the OnePlus Nord 2 and the Oppo Find X3 Lite both performed very well, and while the Moto Edge 20 Lite struggled a little on 4G, it put in a great performance on 5G. It’s also the cheapest phone I tested.
I downloaded the required apps from Google Play using the 5G connection and didn’t really notice any real-world difference in speed between them. The same goes for using Chrome to browse to a few sites and scrubbing through a YouTube video.
Pricey isn’t always best
It’s great to see the MediaTek-powered smartphones hold their own against the Qualcomm-powered phones in this test when last time they differed greatly. The OnePlus Nord 2’s performance with its Dimensity 1200 processor — tweaked by OnePlus using MediaTek’s Dimensity Open Resource Architecture (DORA) initiative — cements it as a highly recommended phone purchase for anyone with around 500 pounds to spend on a new device.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3’s showing is not what I expected, and now requires further investigation, including putting it against other devices with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 processor inside. For now, though, it definitely shows that just because you spend a lot of money on a new phone doesn’t mean you’re guaranteed the best 5G performance, no matter how good the design and features are. So, if you’re looking at a flagship phone in the hopes of using 5G to its full potential, it may not actually be providing you with faster speeds.
