Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Cars
  3. Legacy Archives

Aston Martin CEO: ‘We don’t make utility;’ plans Lagonda SUV anyhow

Add as a preferred source on Google

Seems the Brits at Aston Martin just simply won’t be outdone by, well, the other Brtis at Bentley. Accordingly, Aston is planning a jump-start of the once-axed Lagonda SUV concept, based upon the Mercedes-Benz GL and powered by an Aston 6.0-liter V12. Presumably, this is an answer to the forthcoming Bentley SUV.

Funnily enough, that’s not all Aston has planned for the Lagonda moniker. Aston also plans to use the legendary Aston nameplate to start another offshoot brand. The planned Lagonda brand would encompass, “everything that goes beyond what is our base car line and preferably it will be something like an SUV. But it could be – if I look at the next five or 10 year period – then I could see a variety of possibilities,” Aston Martin boss, Dr. Ulrich Bez, admitted to Drive.

Recommended Videos

This surprising news comes on the heels of a recent report by The Telegraph that Aston posted a $39 million pre-tax loss for 2012.

I’m scratching my head as to why Aston would want to expand its line with another brand when it’s main brand is faltering. When Ford faced losses several years ago, it jettisoned all its brands – including Volvo, which at the time was its only profitable brand – in order to keep Ford alive. Could the reverse plan work? I’m not sure.

The strangeness doesn’t end there, though. Dr. Bez went on to add, “We [Aston] don’t make utility.”

Riddle me this, then, Dr. Bez, what would a huge Aston-built luxury Sport Utility Vehicle based on a German ladder truck frame be, then?

“You do not take an Aston Martin or Lagonda to the shop to buy a fridge and I don’t think this is what utility means to us. It has to have a different kind of comfort and usability,” Bez added.

So Aston, facing losses, is planning another sub-brand that builds large, presumably expensive, truck-based luxury vehicles without any utility. Order the fireworks now, boys, I think we’ve got a hit on our hands.

Nick Jaynes
Former Automotive Editor
Nick Jaynes is the Automotive Editor for Digital Trends. He developed a passion for writing about cars working his way…
Your swanky Mercedes EV could soon run on Samsung battery cells
Mercedes deepens its Korea ties with a new Samsung SDI battery deal
Mercedes-Benz Steer-by-wire yoke-style steering wheel Featured

The next Mercedes-Benz EV could draw power from Samsung cells. Samsung SDI has just signed a multi-year battery supply agreement with Mercedes-Benz, marking the Korean company's first EV battery supply deal with the luxury carmaker.

What to expect from this EV battery deal

Read more
Volvo’s parent just launched a $16,000 EV that looks shockingly luxurious
This $15,600 Geely EV has no business looking this premium
Geely Galaxy Starshine 7 Promo Image

Geely, the Chinese auto giant that also owns Volvo, has just unveiled a new RV that really does not look like it belongs anywhere near the budget end of the market.

The company has just kicked off the presales in China for the Galaxy Starshine 7, with its pricing starting at 112,900 yuan or about $16,550. For that money, buyers get a midsize electric sedan with a sleek fastback silhouette, full-width lighting, a richly trimmed cabin, and even an available dual-motor all-wheel-drive setup that can hit 0 to 100 km/h in 5.4 seconds.

Read more
Xiaomi makes dirt-cheap gadgets, but its CEO just ruled out cheap EVs
Xiaomi is staying out of the bargain EV fight
Xiaomi SU7 EV in blue

Xiaomi has been known for building some surprisingly cheap gadgets that still feel a little more premium than they should. But that philosophy apparently does not extend to electric cars.

According to ITHome, Xiaomi CEO Lei Jun said during a livestream for the company's SU7 endurance challenge on April 17 that Xiaomi will not make vehicles priced below 100,000 Yuan. That works out to be just under $15,000. Lei explained that if consumers expect an electric car to deliver strong intelligent features, software, and overall capability, the cost is harder to squeeze down that far.

Read more