Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Cars
  3. Legacy Archives

Germany and England bury the hatchet: Aston Martin and Mercedes-Benz finalize partnership

Add as a preferred source on Google

It’s official. Aston Martin and Daimler have tied the knot.

The two companies have officially signed a formal agreement for a technical partnership, a move that’s been anticipated since the British and Germans announced the potential partnership earlier this year.

Recommended Videos

As was expected, the deal involves Mercedes-Benz’s AMG performance division supplying engines to Aston Martin. AMG will supply “bespoke” V8s for Aston’s next generation of sports cars, so it doesn’t seem like Aston will be using any off-the-shelf AMG engines.

A statement said the new engines will emphasize both high performance and fuel efficiency, so while AMG may be building completely new engines for Aston, don’t be surprised if it follows the same downsize-and-add-turbochargers mantra it did when increasing the efficiency of its own cars.

It will also be interesting to see what happens to Aston’s signature 5.9-liter V12. The big engine is still important as a symbol of prestige, and it (or some kind of V12) is so closely associated with the brand that it would be hard to imagine Aston giving it up for an all-V8 lineup.

In addition to the headline engine deal, the companies said they were working on an agreement on the supply of electrical components, and that even more cooperation is possible in the future.

The deal should help both carmakers.

Aston Martin is very small, meaning it doesn’t always have the resources to undertake massive development projects – like the design of a new engine.

On the other hand, working with Aston gives Daimler yet another outlet for its AMG engines, amortizing development costs by putting the engines in more cars. Plus Daimler gets a five-percent stake in Aston, which will hopefully benefit its shareholders and profits.

Meanwhile, consumers will likely get a very different – but improved – Aston Martin lineup in a few years.

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Your swanky Mercedes EV could soon run on Samsung battery cells
Mercedes deepens its Korea ties with a new Samsung SDI battery deal
Mercedes-Benz Steer-by-wire yoke-style steering wheel Featured

The next Mercedes-Benz EV could draw power from Samsung cells. Samsung SDI has just signed a multi-year battery supply agreement with Mercedes-Benz, marking the Korean company's first EV battery supply deal with the luxury carmaker.

What to expect from this EV battery deal

Read more
Volvo’s parent just launched a $16,000 EV that looks shockingly luxurious
This $15,600 Geely EV has no business looking this premium
Geely Galaxy Starshine 7 Promo Image

Geely, the Chinese auto giant that also owns Volvo, has just unveiled a new RV that really does not look like it belongs anywhere near the budget end of the market.

The company has just kicked off the presales in China for the Galaxy Starshine 7, with its pricing starting at 112,900 yuan or about $16,550. For that money, buyers get a midsize electric sedan with a sleek fastback silhouette, full-width lighting, a richly trimmed cabin, and even an available dual-motor all-wheel-drive setup that can hit 0 to 100 km/h in 5.4 seconds.

Read more
Xiaomi makes dirt-cheap gadgets, but its CEO just ruled out cheap EVs
Xiaomi is staying out of the bargain EV fight
Xiaomi SU7 EV in blue

Xiaomi has been known for building some surprisingly cheap gadgets that still feel a little more premium than they should. But that philosophy apparently does not extend to electric cars.

According to ITHome, Xiaomi CEO Lei Jun said during a livestream for the company's SU7 endurance challenge on April 17 that Xiaomi will not make vehicles priced below 100,000 Yuan. That works out to be just under $15,000. Lei explained that if consumers expect an electric car to deliver strong intelligent features, software, and overall capability, the cost is harder to squeeze down that far.

Read more