Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Nvidia’s GTX 970 memory woes lead to class action lawsuit

Add as a preferred source on Google

While refunds may help a few hardcore gamers get on with their lives, one Andrew Ostrowski of Michigan requires over five million to excuse Nvidia for its misleading GTX 970 specifications before likely switching sides in the heated desktop GPU war.

The above named plaintiff in a recently filed lawsuit with the US District Court for the Northern District of California is seeking that colossal compensation for himself, as well as other disgruntled GTX 970 owners.

Recommended Videos

Technically, “all persons residing in the United States who purchased a graphics or video card that contains a GTX 970 GPU… since September 2014” are represented in the class action suit, and could collect a cool paycheck if Nvidia is found guilty of “uniformly marketing, advertising, selling, and disseminating information that represents the GTX 970 to have specific capabilities which it does not.”

Gigabyte is called out to defend itself in the same case, as it’s accused of selling products based on the controversial GPU under similar false pretenses. Namely, for those of you not caught up on the news, misleading RAM count.

Though equipped with 4GB memory, as advertised, the GTX 970 partitions its memory into two modules, one 3.5GB in size, the other 512MB. This can hamper performance in games that actually need the entire 4GB.

Furthermore, and possibly more damaging for Nvidia, the number of ROPs (render output units) was erroneously listed at 64 in various publicity materials instead of the actual 56, and the L2 cache was distorted from 1.75 to 2MB.

Will the class action suit take off? That’s hard to say, but the fact it has been filed means nothing good for the green team’s attempts to patch up this PR problem.

Adrian Diaconescu
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Adrian is a mobile aficionado since the days of the Nokia 3310, and a PC enthusiast since Windows 98. Later, he discovered…
Asus reveals ROG Strix XG129C, a tiny secondary monitor chasing Elgato’s gamer lunch
The secondary display category has been waiting for a product that combines a proper screen, real color accuracy, and gaming ecosystem integration in one tidy package.
Strix XG129C secondary display.

If you’ve ever wished your work desk had a dedicated screen for reviewing your system’s performance, chat windows, or streaming controls, so that you don’t have to disturb your main monitor, Asus has heard you. 

The ROG Strix XG129C is a 12.3-inch secondary display with a touchscreen, designed to sit beneath your primary monitor and handle everything that could be a distraction on your main screen, and it costs $199. 

Read more
Intel’s turnaround is one for the ages, without having much to show for it
Wall Street is betting big on Intel before the results arrive
Logo

Intel’s comeback has become one of the market’s biggest surprises. Its stock has risen nearly 490% over the past year, pushing the company back into record territory and reviving confidence in a chipmaker many had written off.

The problem is that Intel still has little product success to justify that excitement.

Read more
Apple’s Continuity features are so good, they make Windows and Android feel incomplete
Android and Windows try, but Apple's ecosystem is on a whole different level.
Mac iPad iPhone with blurred background

Windows and Android platforms have been trying to catch up to Apple's ecosystem. And honestly, in some areas, they have succeeded. But replicating a feature here and there is very different from pulling off what Apple has built. The seamless, almost invisible way all of Apple's devices work together is genuinely hard to replicate.

Apple calls these Continuity features. You can use these features to seamlessly transition from one device to another, unlock devices without entering passwords, transfer files, and much more. 

Read more