Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Study: Cybercrime hits two-thirds Internet users

Add as a preferred source on Google

Norton SymantecA new study from Internet security giant Symantec shows cybercrime affects everyone everywhere, and US Internet users are particularly vulnerable. Almost three-quarters of US Internet users are cybercrime victims, and the US ranks third on the list of countries attacked the most. When looked at globally, the number is still eye-opening, affecting about two-thirds of Internet users. Cybercrime includes computer viruses, online credit card fraud, and identity theft.

The 2011 Norton Cybercrime Report: The Human Impact examined victims’ emotional aftermath to understand user behavior. The only survey asked 7,066 adults aged 18 and over in 14 different countries how they felt about cybercrime. Researchers were interested in seeing what users are doing  to protect themselves before and after the attack. The aftermath is particularly of interest to see how users adjust their behavior to prevent a recurrence.

Recommended Videos

A majority of cybervictims, at 58 percent, reported feeling angry after being attacked. Other strong feelings include being annoyed and cheated. Like many other crimes, these victims tend to blame themselves for being attacked. An overwhelming majority of them feel helpless and don’t expect the criminals to get caught. This often meant they didn’t report the crime, warn friends and family, or do anything about it. Users reported the time it took to resolve the issue as the biggest hassle, followed by dealing with feelings of helplessness, embarrassment, and stress. According to the report, it takes an average of 28 days to resolve the crime.

At least half of the users reported being a victim, which included viruses and malware, responding to online scams and phishing messages, getting their social networking profile hacked, harassed by sexual predators, identity theft, and credit card fraud. Even so, only 44 percent reported the crime to the police, and usually only when there was an actual financial loss or threat of physical harm.

According to the study, despite the fact that only nine percent of the users feel very safe online, only 55 percent of the users considered cybercrime a potential threat. They are also distressingly honest about their personal information, financial status, and contact details. Users don’t realize their behavior is opening themselves up to security threats, such as downloading music and movies or secretly viewing someone else’s emails. Scarily, only half the respondents said they would change their behavior if they were ever a victim.

Users are trying to be a little bit more careful, regularly reviewing credit card statements and using different passwords for sites, and using security software. They just need to be more proactive about safety, since the next attack may just be a click away.

Fahmida Y. Rashid
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Nvidia’s RTX Spark made me hate content creation a little less
Adobe's AI-powered demos showed me a future where masking, rotoscoping, and scene detection might finally stop being a chore.
NVIDIA RTX Spark for Creators Image Generation Demo Computex 2026

Every video editor has a list of tasks they'd happily outsource to someone else. Exporting isn't one of them anymore because modern laptops are already plenty fast. The real-time sinks are the boring bits: manually masking subjects, finding scene cuts in long recordings, rotoscoping frame by frame, or wrestling with tedious edits that require more patience than creativity.

That's exactly why NVIDIA's RTX Spark demo at Computex 2026 caught me by surprise. I walked into the booth expecting another presentation full of AI buzzwords and benchmark charts. Instead, I walked out thinking that for the first time in years, hardware might actually be changing the editing experience itself, rather than simply making renders finish a little sooner.

Read more
I tried Acer’s new 5K MiniLED Gaming monitor, and OLED kept popping into my head
After seeing it in action at Computex, I finally understand where MiniLED shines and where OLED still wins.
MiniLED vs OLED Hands On Computex 2026

If Computex 2026 taught me one thing, it's that monitor makers are no longer interested in building one-trick ponies. They want displays that can wear multiple hats, seamlessly switching between work and play without making users choose. Acer's new Nitro XV345CKR P is perhaps the best example of that philosophy, and after spending time with it on the show floor, I walked away impressed by its ambition while also questioning whether MiniLED is really the future for gaming monitors.

I've always had a slightly complicated relationship with MiniLED. On a massive living room TV, it works wonders because you're sitting several feet away, and the local dimming zones blend beautifully. Put the same technology on a monitor that's sitting barely two feet from your face, however, and suddenly you're no longer admiring the display, you're inspecting the physics behind it.

Read more
Ugreen’s portable monitor is utterly sharp, sleek, and costs a pretty penny
Computer, Electronics, Pc

Portable monitors have become the Swiss Army knives of modern tech. They travel with remote workers, expand cramped laptop screens, and occasionally double as gaming displays in hotel rooms. Most of them also follow a familiar formula: a basic Full HD panel, a foldable cover, and a price that stays comfortably under $250. Ugreen clearly looked at that formula and decided to ignore it.

The company's new AP16 portable monitor has officially landed in the U.S., bringing a feature list that feels more like a premium desktop display than something designed to slip into a backpack. The catch is that it costs $350, placing it well above many rivals.

Read more