Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Apple
  4. Opinion
  5. Features

I bought a four-year-old MacBook Pro instead of a new one. Here’s why

Add as a preferred source on Google
Image used with permission by copyright holder

“Apple no longer innovates.” It’s a line we’ve been hearing from naysayers EVER since Tim Cook took over the reigns from Steve Jobs. But is it really true? Just look at the Apple Pro Display XDR and its, err, $999 monitor arm. Actually, don’t look at that.

Apple does innovate, of course, and the latest MacBook Pro models — with monstrous eight-core i9 processors and Touch Bars aplenty — are no exception. There’s enough innovation in both software and hardware to impress even the most curmudgeonly of cynics.

So when the time rolled around for me to kit myself out with a shiny new MacBook, you would think I headed straight for the 2019 MacBook Pro and paid like it was going out of fashion. Wrong. I completely ignored it. In fact, I didn’t so much ignore it as turn around and high-tail it in the opposite direction. I bought a 2015 MacBook Pro instead.

Why opt for a four-year-old MacBook Pro instead of the latest and greatest model from just a few months ago? After all, this year’s model comes with a keyboard that’s even less likely to fail and ignore your key presses. How’s that for innovation?

Well, that seems like a good place to start.

The keys to success

That keyboard is certainly a sticking point, as it were. I’m a denizen of both the Microsoft and Apple worlds, and use a nice chunky mechanical keyboard with my Windows PC. Apple has always made fantastic keyboards, but these days going from a mech to a Mac is like being under house arrest — there’s just no travel.

That’s not the main problem for me, though. I used a 2018 MacBook Pro for work for a time and soon got used to the shallower key presses. I appreciated the larger keys and quieter tapping compared to the clattering cacophony of my mechanical board. But the feel and the travel were never the main problems for me; that dubious honor belongs to the keyboard’s infuriating unreliability.

Digital Trends

Apple first unleashed its “butterfly” keyboard on the world in 2015’s 12-inch MacBook, and the fact that it’s already on its third revision in a little over four years is not exactly encouraging. They’ve tried adding membranes and strengthening the mechanisms with different materials with every new release, but still the keyboards drop letters like a clumsy postman.

I had the joy of experiencing this firsthand when the “B” key stopped working on my work MacBook. The tranquil office air was pierced by my frenzied tapping as I attempted to spell ‘baboon’ or ‘flibbertigibbet’ without going mad. I have enough reasons to be angry (the economy, getting beaten by children at videos games, why I don’t have my own exotic menagerie, etc). I don’t need another, especially when you type for a living.

Why spend more?

A frequent topic that comes up in both casual conversations and online punditry is that you can get similar specs for less cash if you opt for a Windows laptop over a MacBook. One thing that always gets missed is that Apple’s portables last a lot longer than their Windows brethren — only 10% fail by the third year of ownership, according to Consumer Reports, around half that of Windows rivals.

My brother is still chugging along on a 2008 MacBook Pro, and it handles all his requirements — including high-end music production software — like a true champ. Meanwhile my old plastic-shelled Windows laptop from the same year died after a paltry 24 months.

Bill Roberson/Digital Trends

In making its products so reliable, Apple has created something of a problem for itself. There’s just no need to upgrade to the latest and greatest unless you absolutely have to. It’s one reason the Cupertino giant is shifting towards services and relying less on selling phones: There are more than enough iPhones to go around.

A 2015 MacBook Pro has more than enough power for most people, and unless there’s a specific reason for you to get a newer model — the Core i9 processor, say — upgrading is not strictly necessary. My demanding workload of browsing cat videos in my pajamas does not require a Touch Bar.

With Apple saying MacOS Catalina will work on Macs all the way back to 2012, I’m not worried about being left behind any time soon, even though my MacBook is already four years old. Apple sticks by its older devices for a pretty long time, and even when I can’t get the latest OS, the MacBook will still be going strong.

Don’t get me wrong, I like the latest MacBooks. The build quality is superb, the trackpads are wonderful, and the software wipes the floor with Windows. But I can get all that — for a hell of a lot cheaper — in a 2015 model.

So, next time you’re considering a new MacBook, don’t forget the older generation. They may not be the newest, trendiest kids on the block, but they can type whatever you want without a hitch. Unfortunately, it’s a testament to the state of the current MacBook that being able to type reliably is a selling point.

Alex Blake
Alex Blake has been working with Digital Trends since 2019, where he spends most of his time writing about Mac computers…
AI’s chip hunger could keep memory prices painfully high for years
Memory shortages may haunt your next phone, laptop, and GPU for years
Crucial Memory and SSD

While recent reports claimed that memory prices may not fall till 2027, it seems like the memory chip crunch isn't a short-term headache. And that's bad news for anyone hoping phone, laptop, and GPU prices will get cheaper again soon.

Reuters reports that SK Group chairman Chey Tae-won said the global chip wafer shortage is likely to last until 2030, with artificial intelligence demand continuing to outpace the supply. Chey said the current shortage could remain above 20%, largely because AI systems require huge amounts of high-bandwidth memory and therefore burn through a lot of wafers.

Read more
One of the most controversial US agencies is reportedly taste-testing Anthropic uber-powerful Mythos AI
The agency's reported use of Mythos highlights a widening split inside the US government over AI risk
Claude AI on an iPhone.

The US government's AI fight just got harder to square. The National Security Agency is reportedly using Anthropic's Mythos Preview even as senior Pentagon officials keep pushing to cut the company off over supply chain concerns. It shows how quickly real security needs can outrun official policy.

Since February, the Defense Department has been trying to block Anthropic and push vendors to do the same. Yet, according to an Axios report, the NSA appears to be moving ahead with one of the company's most powerful models anyway, suggesting cybersecurity demand is carrying more weight than the feud now playing out inside government.

Read more
AI streaming is going mainstream in China, whether audiences want it or not
IQiyi wants AI to make most of its content someday, and it's already starting.
man holding tablet watching iQiyi

China's Netflix, iQiyi, is making one of the biggest bets in streaming history. The company wants AI to create the bulk of its films and shows someday soon, and it's already restructuring its 16-year-old business to make that happen.

At its annual content showcase in Beijing, founder and CEO Gong Yu announced that iQiyi is pivoting its popular streaming platform into a social media destination built around AI-generated content. 

Read more