Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Audio / Video
  3. Legacy Archives

Are cord cutters really cheapskates? Many ‘TV Everywhere’ viewers continue to pay

Add as a preferred source on Google

“Cord-cutting” can be a misleading term. Oftentimes, the savviest of these so-called “cord-cutters” haven’t cut any cords at all. In a way, they’re merely extending their cord so they can access their favorite content where they want and when they want. This is essentially what “TV Everywhere” services (think Xfinity or WatchESPN) aim to do, and cable and satellite providers are offering them up to their subscribers to satiate shifting expectations.

It’s tempting to look at the current TV and video landscape and see two distinct sides at war: the clean-cut pay-TV loyalists on one end, and the savvy cord-cutters, imbibing all things streaming on the other. But research is starting to indicate a middle ground that’s a lot less black and white. Adobe has published a report showing that people are streaming broadcast television via smartphone in greater numbers than ever before. Even though pay-TV customers can choose to watch their shows and movies on a traditional TV at any point, they’re increasingly not, because they enjoy being able to watch what they want, when they want.

Recommended Videos

The study found that so-called ‘TV Everywhere’ viewing, or the consumption of pay-TV programming on the go, grew a massive 246 percent from last year, outpacing online video sources like Youtube and Hulu across all devices. The report’s data is derived from consumer video viewing in 2013 and 2014, and is comprised of aggregated and anonymous data from media and entertainment sites. (It should be noted, however, that the report did not include the streaming powerhouse, Netflix, in its numbers, skewing the results.)

According to the Adobe Digital Index report, U.S. Digital Video Benchmark, there were a record 35.6 billion total global online video starts (any browser-based initiation of video content without authentication, such as a cable subscription) during the first quarter of 2014, which represented a 43 percent growth over the previous year. Video-streaming via smartphone increased 73 percent over the previous year, while that of tablets grew 42 percent. Gaming consoles saw the highest market share increase: 75 percent. 

Not surprisingly, people are also digging deeper into watching video on mobile devices. Viewing via iOS apps surpassed desktop browsers to become the most popular online TV format. For the first time, iOS applications now hold a greater market share (43 percent) than browsers (36 percent). Additionally, Android apps are now the fastest-growing access points after increasing 202 percent.

This isn’t the first time we’ve encountered the gray area between the all-inclusive cord-cutter and the purely pay-TV subscriber. Last month, the NPD Group found that consumers who pay for over-the-top video-on-demand (VOD) services like Netflix aren’t necessarily cord-cutters. In fact, the research found that said subscribers are actually among the most active TV Everywhere users – three out of four subscription VOD homes also have a pay-TV subscription.

So what conclusion can we draw from all of these stats, and percentages? Right now, though it may be difficult to see from our present vantage point within the movement, we’re witnessing a sea change in TV viewing. In 50 years, the 20-somethings of today may very well wax nostalgic over the “golden days” of watching a show when it aired, or not watching it at all. The DVR liberated us from that inflexibility, and content began moving online shortly after – nothing’s been the same since. The current phase we find ourselves in is one of baby steps. Most broadcasters are finally seeing the doom in holding on to their rapidly-aging business models, and are thus incrementally offering up new forms of content access, often in the form of TV Everywhere services.

If you could get your TV over the Internet and have access to anything you wanted, without a cable/satellite subscription, you’d do that, right? Just about anyone would, and so every time broadcasters bring out a new tray to add to the Internet-TV buffet, people rush to the table to fill their plates. As a result, this new breed of TV viewer retains aspects of both cord-cutters and pay-TV traditionalists, and it will continue to transform until all viewing is done online. The online-video trend will only pick up more steam as advertisers throw increasing amounts of money at these portals, tempting broadcasters to increasingly move their content online.

Presently, cord-cutters who’ve severed ties with cable/satellite providers have to either simply give up a ton of their content, or seek it out through illegal means (piracy). If you don’t want to torrent, or don’t know how, TV Everywhere gets you the freedom you want to watch what you want, when you want – it is more costly, though. Customers love the WatchESPN app, which allows viewing ESPN programming online – but it’s not available as a standalone service. You can’t exclusively pay for ESPN because broadcasters aren’t offering à la carte-style subscriptions yet, because broadcasters and pay-TV providers aren’t offering them, for a number of reasons. But numbers such as those published in Adobe’s report indicate a populace that is clamoring for that type of distribution model.

As is often the case, the current paradigm is evolving in baby steps, one TV Everywhere update at a time. But make no mistake, the future is coming – whether the pay-TV powers that be want it to or not.

Alex Tretbar
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Alex Tretbar, audio/video intern, is a writer, editor, musician, gamer and sci-fi nerd raised on EverQuest and Magic: The…
Plex wants to force its users into a subscription trap, and honestly, I’m a little mad
The best deal in streaming just got three times more expensive overnight.
Plex website open on MacBook

I have been a Plex user for a long time, and I genuinely love what the app does. But when I read their latest announcement, I had to put my phone down and take a breath. Plex is raising the price of its Lifetime Plex Pass from $249.99 to $749.99 on July 1, 2026. 

That's not a price increase. That's a 200% jump, and the way they've packaged it makes me even more annoyed. This comes on top of the price hike the company announced last year, taking the lifetime pass from $119.99 to $249.99 and the remote pass price hike it announced last month.

Read more
Google and Xreal’s Project Aura smart glasses will ship later this year
Xreal Project Aura smart glasses come with built-in display units and run Android apps.
Front view of Xreal Project Aura smart glasses.

Google is working on a whole bunch of smart glasses. The first one running on the Android XR platform developed by Samsung is expected to arrive close to July. The slate, it seems, will get crowded pretty soon. Earlier today at the I/O 2026 Developers Conference, Google also showed off a new class of audio glasses that have been designed in partnership with Warby Parker and Gentle Monster.

But the most interesting of the bunch is the Xreal Project Aura smart glasses, which support full hand gesture support as well as mixed reality view for Android apps available through the Play Store. These smart glasses were first showcased in December 2025, but Xreal confirmed earlier today that the Project Aura smart glasses will hit the shelves in 2026. 

Read more
Google shows off Android audio glasses designed by Gentle Monster and Warby Parker
Designed in collaboration with Warby Parker and Gentle Monster, the smart glasses will arrive later this year.
Gemini smart glasses.

At the I/O 2026 Developer Conference, Google gave us our first look at the upcoming Gemini-powered Intelligent Eyewear. Running atop the Android XR stack, these glasses have been developed in collaboration with Samsung and Qualcomm, while the design DNA has been developed by Gentle Monster and Warby Parker. The partner is similar to the work that Meta has done with its own smart glasses, which started with a partnership with Ray-Ban and later expanded to Oakley, as well. 

Google is calling them audio glasses because they don't come with a built-in screen, and most of the interactions that you will have with Gemini will be through voice and audio inputs. There are two cameras on the front of these smart glasses for image capture and understanding the world around you. And based on what Gemini sees through the camera, you will be able to ask questions. 

Read more