Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Business
  4. Mobile
  5. News

Uber’s inadequate background checks for drivers has cost it $10M

Add as a preferred source on Google

Uber has agreed to pay out millions of dollars to settle a lawsuit claiming it misled customers about the service’s safety.

Thursday’s settlement concerns the ride-hailing company’s operation in San Francisco and Los Angeles and was the result of a consumer protection lawsuit filed in 2014.

Recommended Videos

Uber has to pay $10 million within 60 days, with the payment likely to be split equally between the two cities. Should it fail to comply, the amount will automatically increase to $25 million, the LA Times reported.

George Gascón, one of two district attorneys that filed the lawsuit, said Uber had been making unreasonable claims about the robustness of its background checks on new drivers, checks the company had trumpeted as “industry leading” and “the gold standard.”

The attorney claimed the checks were “completely worthless” as they didn’t even involve fingerprinting new recruits when checking for past convictions, something most taxi companies have long done, adding that by repeating the “misleading” statements, Uber was “giving consumers a false sense of security when deciding whether to get into a stranger’s car.”

During the case proceedings last year, Gascón and district attorney Jackie Lacey claimed Uber’s procedures, which include the examination of county, federal, and multi-state criminal background records, resulted in the company missing criminal records for 25 Uber applicants in San Francisco and Los Angeles. They said this was partly down to Uber ignoring a database of around 30,000 registered sex offenders, and also because the checks only cover the preceding seven years.

Uber said it’s already stopped claiming that its background checks are the best in the industry following the settlement of another case in February, and says it also made improvements to its vetting procedures.

The LA Times described Thursday’s settlement as “relatively small” and “something of a coup” for the company, which today is valued at $62.5 billion.

Commenting on the court’s decision, an Uber spokesperson said, “We’re glad to put this case behind us and excited to redouble our efforts serving riders and drivers across the state of California.”

Responding, Gascón said Thursday’s outcome goes “well beyond its impact on Uber,” adding that “it sends a clear message to all businesses, and to startups in particular, that in the quest to quickly obtain market share, laws designed to protect consumers cannot be ignored. If a business acts like it is above the law, it will pay a heavy price.”

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
The memory crisis isn’t going to ease, and you will pay the price for it, says a research firm
Forty to 50% higher this quarter, 30 to 40% more next quarter, and no real relief until 2028. Plan accordingly.
RAM memory chips

If you were hoping the memory crisis was about to ease up, I have some bad news for you. It comes directly from Wall Street.

Your next smartphone, laptop, or tablet could cost even more, regardless of whether it has recently been subject to a price hike.

Read more
Screens before age two may come with serious developmental risks, study warns
Using a phone or a tablet to keep your baby occupied is not a good idea.
Kid using an iPad

Screens have become the digital pacifier for many babies. Phones and tablets are used during feeding, bedtime, chores, and moments when parents need a break. A major new study now warns that regular screen use before age two may carry developmental risks.

Researchers from four UK universities say babies and toddlers under two should avoid regular intentional screen time. The review links higher screen exposure in the first two years with sleep problems, language delays, behavioural difficulties, obesity risk, short-sightedness, and later problems with friendships and social interactions.

Read more
I tried the AI-powered Extend photo trick in iOS 27, and it blew past my expectations
The Extend feature won't fool everyone, but for casual social media edits, it's surprisingly easy to rely on.
Photography, Wood, Electronics

I wasn’t among the first to install the iOS 27 developer beta, but once I did, I began appreciating the changes Apple has made. The Photos app, in particular, has received one of its most substantial upgrades, adding an improved Clean Up tool, Spatial Reframing, and the new Extend feature, the one I was most eager to try. 

After spending some time with it on my iPhone 17, here’s how the tool has performed so far. Spoiler alert: it’s one of the most substantial additions to Apple’s previously slim lineup of AI features. I’ve tried the feature on several different photos, including a selfie I took in front of a dam in northern India, photos of food items on a table, and shots taken indoors and outdoors.

Read more