Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Business
  4. News

AMD’s CTO says Chromebooks aren’t a good fit for its chips

Add as a preferred source on Google

It’s no big secret that AMD lags behind archrivals Intel and Nvidia in CPU and GPU sales for both laptop and desktop use. The perennial underdog can’t close the massive popularity gaps to the market leaders anytime soon, no matter how late Skylake arrives, and how badly GeForce specs are messed up.

It therefore makes sense for leadership shuffles to happen, and new paths be pursued in the quest to profitability. But apparently, Chromebooks are still deemed too experimental and niche-y to even give them a try.

Recommended Videos

AMD’s Chief Technical Officer, Mark Papermaster, quashed any sort of speculation regarding a possible collaboration with Google, suggesting the search giant’s “objective” for the platform doesn’t match his company’s ambitions.

“For us, it’s when do you need our CPU and graphics capability that can make a difference.” Papermaster stated, adding “these rock-bottom markets… don’t have our value proposition.” In other words, AMD doesn’t think Chromebooks could benefit from the graphics portion of the company’s APU’s, and that the low-cost notebooks don’t match the capabilities of the company’s platforms.

Sounds logical, until you realize AMD has an APU family under its belt already that seems handcrafted for low-cost, low-power Chrome OS notebooks. Remember Mullins? It never quite took off, but found its way inside a few dirt-cheap Windows machines nonetheless. HP’s $230 Stream 14, for instance. Weak graphics performance is a common problem in Chromebooks, so an AMD-powered system might stand out as a result.

So, what’s actually stopping the “Red Team” from striking a mutually lucrative partnership with Big G? It could be that AMD doesn’t trust the growing potential of Chromebooks. After all, shipments are on the rise, especially in the education segment, but on the whole, these still account for a fraction of global Windows PC sales.

At the same time, maybe it’s Google that doesn’t want to be associated with AMD. They have Intel in their corner, for Atom, Celeron and Core use, and they can always opt for ARM-based solutions from a slew of bigger or smaller chip suppliers. Whatever the real reason, it’s time to stop dreaming for Carrizo-powered Chromebooks.

Adrian Diaconescu
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Adrian is a mobile aficionado since the days of the Nokia 3310, and a PC enthusiast since Windows 98. Later, he discovered…
Asus reveals ROG Strix XG129C, a tiny secondary monitor chasing Elgato’s gamer lunch
The secondary display category has been waiting for a product that combines a proper screen, real color accuracy, and gaming ecosystem integration in one tidy package.
Strix XG129C secondary display.

If you’ve ever wished your work desk had a dedicated screen for reviewing your system’s performance, chat windows, or streaming controls, so that you don’t have to disturb your main monitor, Asus has heard you. 

The ROG Strix XG129C is a 12.3-inch secondary display with a touchscreen, designed to sit beneath your primary monitor and handle everything that could be a distraction on your main screen, and it costs $199. 

Read more
Intel’s turnaround is one for the ages, without having much to show for it
Wall Street is betting big on Intel before the results arrive
Logo

Intel’s comeback has become one of the market’s biggest surprises. Its stock has risen nearly 490% over the past year, pushing the company back into record territory and reviving confidence in a chipmaker many had written off.

The problem is that Intel still has little product success to justify that excitement.

Read more
Apple’s Continuity features are so good, they make Windows and Android feel incomplete
Android and Windows try, but Apple's ecosystem is on a whole different level.
Mac iPad iPhone with blurred background

Windows and Android platforms have been trying to catch up to Apple's ecosystem. And honestly, in some areas, they have succeeded. But replicating a feature here and there is very different from pulling off what Apple has built. The seamless, almost invisible way all of Apple's devices work together is genuinely hard to replicate.

Apple calls these Continuity features. You can use these features to seamlessly transition from one device to another, unlock devices without entering passwords, transfer files, and much more. 

Read more