Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Emerging Tech
  4. News

IBM's Watson has landed a customer assistant job at Macy's

Add as a preferred source on Google

It seems that IBM’s Watson has finally blown through the $1 million that it won on a 2011 episode of the quiz show Jeopardy, as the system has found a day job. Department store chain Macy’s has announced that the question answering computer is set to start serving its customers as an in-store shopping assistant.

IBM and Macy’s have announced a pilot program that will span ten stores across the United States, according to a report from Venture Beat. The service will be called Macy’s On Call, and is accessible via web browser whether you’re in-store or at home.

Recommended Videos

Watson is particularly well-suited to this role, because the system is capable of answering questions asked in natural human language. IBM gave the example of a customer inquiring “where are the ladies shoes?” as the sort of query that the service will be able to take care of.

Like all good store attendants, Watson will handle questions about particular products, help customers negotiate the layout of the store, and even detail various in-store services that are specific to particular branches. However, IBM’s system hasn’t quite wrestled this job away from human workers just yet.

The pilot program will see five stores catered to by Watson flying solo, while another five will pair the computer with the option to request assistance from a Macy’s employee. It remains to be seen whether customers will prefer the more technologically reliant option, or would rather stick with a human touch.

The ten participating stores are spread across the country, and the pilot program is scheduled to last until late fall. Macy’s customers can check whether their local outlet are included in the program by heading to the Store Help page on the retailer’s website.

Brad Jones
Brad is an English-born writer currently splitting his time between Edinburgh and Pennsylvania. You can find him on Twitter…
AI may have just won a literary prize. My heart weeps seeing it poison our love for books.
updated book and AI photo

I had a hard time processing this news. As someone who has been deeply in love with stories since childhood and who grew up on the works of Arthur Conan Doyle, Terry Pratchett, J.R.R. Tolkien, and other such venerable authors, seeing an AI-written story win a prestigious writing award is hard to digest. 

If you are unaware, the winners for the Commonwealth Short Story Prize for 2026 were announced, and three of the five winning regional stories have been found to be entirely or partially written by AI. Or at least that seems to be the consensus among readers. As a reader and an amateur fiction writer, this hurt me deeper than any other tale of AI corroding our lives.

Read more
Canva and Adobe are coming to Gemini, and they want to make everything chatty
Adobe and Canva are plugging into Google’s assistant, betting that creative work starts with a prompt, not an app icon
Art, Collage, Photography

Canva and Adobe are moving deeper into Google Gemini, giving the assistant a bigger role before users ever open a design app.

Adobe says its "Adobe for creativity" connector is coming to Gemini in the coming weeks, giving users a way to describe tasks and send them through Adobe tools for imaging, design, and video. Canva is already rolling out its Connected App for Gemini in select English-language markets, with full availability coming soon.

Read more
AI can pass the Turing Test in live chats and appear more human than us. I am spooked now
UC San Diego researchers found GPT-4.5 was judged human 73% of the time in live conversations
Image of a human woman next to an AI-generated face with Real or Fake text at the bottom.

AI can pass the Turing Test in live chats, and the latest result lands with a chill. In a UC San Diego study, GPT-4.5 outperformed real participants at convincing judges there was a person on the other side.

The setup was harder to shrug off than a standard benchmark. Judges reacted to real-time exchanges rather than static prompts, then made a fast call based on conversation alone.

Read more